AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Aileen Huang

ACTG076 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
1/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle an unusually heavy online workload with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming WorkloadTime ConsumingHeavy AssignmentsAvoid Online
  • Students consistently describe the online workload as unreasonable.
  • Both reviews give the lowest quality rating and highest difficulty rating.
  • No review provides positive .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

There is no grade evidence, and the comments suggest the workload makes earning an A very costly.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The comments focus on workload rather than concepts, but students describe the class as very difficult to get through.

, so the course challenge reflects the online experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly warn others away because the online workload feels excessive and time consuming.

All recommendation evidence comes from online reviews, with no in-person comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

The reviews , but the heavy workload lowers the practical grade outlook.

Format shift

Only online reviews mention the course, and .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students report 5-6 assignments per week and describe the workload as horrific and unreasonable.

Format shift

The workload concern comes entirely from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Both reviews give very low ratings and focus on an unacceptable course experience rather than effective teaching.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Students describe frequent assignments and McGraw Hill Connect work, with .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, while there are .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students describe the class as extremely time consuming with 5-6 assignments per week.

Main concern

The workload is repeatedly described as unreasonable for an online class.

What students said

“she assigns SO MUCH WORK.”
ACTG076
“Everything is VIA mcgrawhill connect as well so it is so so time consuming.”
ACTG076

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“On average 5-6 assignments a week, actually horrific prof I would never wish this class on anybody.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting repeated workload complaints and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“On average 5-6 assignments a week, actually horrific prof I would never wish this class on anybody.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“if you !”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Experience

15/100

“she assigns so much work for an online it is truly unacceptable.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • she assigns SO MUCH WORK.
  • So much work. Like genuinely it seems unreasonable how much work.
  • Everything is VIA mcgrawhill connect as well so it is so so time consuming.

Theme 2

🚫 About Taking the Class

  • I would never wish this class on anybody.
  • if you !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are consistent and specific about workload.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACTG0762 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2