AI Rate Professor

Radiological Sciences

Lisa Chesser-Nielsen

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle a tedious workload and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed ExperienceTough GradingIndustry KnowledgeClear ExpectationsParticipation Matters
  • Student opinion is sharply split between excellent instruction and unfair treatment.
  • and strong professional knowledge.
  • and favoritism.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades appear achievable, but students describe tedious work and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The class is manageable when expectations are clear, but the workload and .

, so the course difficulty reflects that setting.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters is tagged, but the comments do not prove a .

The only evidence is in-person, and it suggests .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends on whether students experience her as clear and knowledgeable or unfair and tough.

All and is sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but another directly calls her tough and unfair with grading.

Format shift

, and they conflict.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The positive review still calls the class tedious with work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One student calls her amazing and knowledgeable, while another says some people should not teach.

Format shift

comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The comments mention work, participation, and lecture style but .

Format shift

, and assessment evidence is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with one student praising clarity and another criticizing fairness.

Main concern

The main concern is and fairness.

What students said

“What is expected of you is very clearly written out so it's easy to stay on top of it all.”
21709
“Clicky, unfair and tough with .”
21709

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterm, final, or proctoring policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Clicky, unfair and tough with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

35/100

“Clicky, unfair and tough with .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Lisa was an amazing professor and you can tell she knows what she's talking about due to her years of experience as a rad tech herself.”

📋 Course Structure

50/100

“What is expected of you is very clearly written out so it's easy to stay on top of it all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lisa was an amazing professor and you can tell she knows what she's talking about due to her years of experience as a rad tech herself.
  • Some people shouldn't teach.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades & Fairness

  • What is expected of you is very clearly written out so it's easy to stay on top of it all.
  • Clicky, unfair and tough with .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • It is a tedious class with work but the lay out is great!
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

There are only two recent reviews, and their strong disagreement limits confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

217092 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values