AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Lauren Arenson

HUM002 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and are ready for , and a tough grader.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Reading LoadSo Many PapersStrict RubricsAvoid This Class
  • One recent online review rates her 1/5 for a humanities course.
  • Students , and strict grading on explicit connections only.
  • Attendance is optional but the workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and a B under strict paper rubrics show an A needs heavy explicit work, not light effort.

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Massive reading volume and trivial subject.

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

The .

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Quality is 1/5, would-take-again is 0%, and the student calls the class useless and over-policed.

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tagged Tough grader with strict demands that connections be explicit, not implied.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Tags and comments stress ungodly reading volume plus so many papers.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Student says the class is useless and the professor over-cares about forgettable content.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and many papers rather than exams.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online HUM002 is framed as and and little perceived value.

Main concern

Ungodly reading load and .

What students said

“Makes you read an ungodly amount of material about a trivial class.”
HUM002
“Grades considerably strictly considering that the entire class is basically useless.”
HUM002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and , so exam friendliness is unclear.

Paper-HeavyHeavy Reading

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence stresses many papers and ; .

Paper-HeavyHeavy Reading
“Makes you read an ungodly amount of material about a trivial class.”
HUM002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Makes you read an ungodly amount of material about a trivial class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review with tags and a detailed negative comment. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Overwhelming Workload

15/100

“Makes you read an ungodly amount of material about a trivial class.”

⚖️

18/100

“Grades considerably strictly considering that the entire class is basically useless.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“Cares too much about a class everybody will forget about in 2 weeks.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Grades considerably strictly
  • connections she asks for have to explicit and cannot be implied

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • So many papers
  • ungodly amount of material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent online review exists, so scores rest on a single detailed but unreplicated account.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUM0021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values