AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Manan Darbinian

CHEM22 · CHEM1A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Solid pick for intro chem if you show up, do the homework, and use ; skip if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit AvailableClear LecturesLots of HomeworkMixed Student ReceptionParticipation Matters
  • Most , and achievable As with consistent work.
  • A , and a defensive classroom style.
  • Attendance is often mandatory; , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students who listen, finish homework, and +, though work is required and a few hit harsh or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Intro chemistry is presented clearly for many, but difficulty ratings and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, with participation and classroom rules mattering.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and fair paths to high grades, but two strongly negative experiences pull the recommendation down.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

and , but some report inconsistent or overlooked work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Multiple reviews flag lots of homework and regular prep to earn high grades.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and kind; others describe defensive or convenience-first teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grades rest on homework, labs, quizzes or exams, plus participation and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and structured for many, with and board participation, but a few students report rushed assignments and harsh classroom rules.

Main concern

Inconsistent support and and lots of homework.

What students said

“I took her 6-week winter session and have never understood introductory chemistry so clearly before.”
CHEM22
“As long as you pay attention in lectures, you will do good and easily get an A.”
CHEM1A
“I would not recommend this professor She focuses more on her own convenience than student learning”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as straightforward or easier than homework, with strict in-class phone rules during tests.

Easy ExamsNo QuizzesPhone Penalty PolicyIn-Person Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one review notes a whole-class phone penalty policy during tests.

Easy ExamsNo QuizzesPhone Penalty Policy
“No quizzes, and .”
CHEM22
“Exams and .”
CHEM1A
“if a phone was heard during the test everyone gets 10 off”
CHEM22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you listen, do the homework, and review your notes, you can get an A”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, grade paths, and polarized concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

72/100

“have never understood introductory chemistry so clearly before”

📈 Path to an A

78/100

“As long as you pay attention in lectures, you will do good and easily get an A”

⚠️ Polarized Experience

40/100

“I would not recommend this professor She focuses more on her own convenience than student learning”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always made sure students understood what she was teaching
  • Her lectures and labs are so straightforward
  • and what not to do

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Exams and
  • Gives lots of as well

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • and work may be overlooked
  • an insecure, defensive professor
  • Questions are often dismissed or not answered clearly

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews with detailed comments and grade data, but polarized experiences lower consistency.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM223 reviews
CHEM1A2 reviews
778161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1