AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Leah Walden-Hurtgen

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want real-world content and grade buffers that forgive major absences.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Points BufferReal World FocusAbsence FlexibleGood ProfessorGrade Recoverable
  • Gives useful real-world anthropology context
  • Described as a really good professor overall

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

weeks still believed they earned an A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty rated moderate; content is not framed as trivial, just well supported.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Student missed three weeks and still finished strongly; formal policy is not stated.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Called a really good professor with practical content, though not a .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

class time.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

No heavy-workload complaints, but details are sparse.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Student calls her a really good professor who brings real-world information.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and real-world examples; student still expected an A after long absences.

Main concern

Only one older review with almost no policy detail.

What students said

“with the an A.”
20316
“She is a really good professor and gives plenty of real world information.”
20316

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a really good professor and gives plenty of real world information.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting support and grade buffers. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She is a really good professor and gives plenty of real world information.”

📈 Grade Buffer

78/100

“with the an A.”

🗓️ Absence Flexibility

58/100

“I had a job that needed me to miss 3 weeks of school, with the an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really good professor
  • gives plenty of real world information

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • with the an A
  • miss 3 weeks of school

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

26/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2014 review with thin detail and no grade or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

203161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values