AI Rate Professor

Hospitality

Annette Alvarado

CA120 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you and public critique; many students found the class demoralizing.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderStrict LabsStressful CritiquesThorough FeedbackRead Recipes
  • Majority describe a
  • Techniques often not demonstrated; public critiques and zero tolerance for tiny errors
  • One positive student says prepare ahead, ask questions, and you can succeed

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

; grades of B are common and tiny , so an A requires careful prep.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and skill precision with little room for beginner mistakes.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Two of three students give quality 1 and would not endorse the class culture despite one strong positive review.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Repeated Tough grader tags; zero for being 1 degree off and .

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

and and time-sensitive.

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

and skill labs, but many report missing demos, disengagement, and demoralizing critiques.

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Ongoing lab performance plus thorough midterm and .

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Polarizing in-person CA120 lab: two reviews call it the , while one praises thorough skill-building if you prepare.

Main concern

, and stressful public critiques of student products.

What students said

“Very discouraging class. Important techniques were rarely demonstrated, and students were often criticized for common beginner mistakes instead of being taught.”
CA120
“Chef Alvarado is very thorough with and final.”
CA120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Midterm and grading standards.

Lab MidtermLab FinalStrict GradingRecipe Prep

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final are graded very thoroughly; and critiques can be public.

Thorough MidtermThorough FinalZero For Tiny ErrorsPublic Critiques
“Chef Alvarado is very thorough with and final.”
CA120
“ for being 1° off.”
CA120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very discouraging class. Important techniques were rarely demonstrated, and students were often criticized for common beginner mistakes instead of being taught.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 In and mixed support quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

20/100

“ for being 1° off.”

😰

25/100

“public critiques of our products created a stressful learning environment.”

📘 Prep Path To Success

55/100

“Read the recipes and prepare ahead of time and you will do well on the labs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Important techniques were rarely demonstrated
  • often seemed disengaged

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • zero for being 1° off
  • thorough with and final

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three recent in-person reviews for the same course with and one positive counterpoint.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CA1203 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values