AI Rate Professor

English

Vicki Martineau-Gilliam

BT112 · ENGL1B · ENGL1A · ENG3 · ENGLISH1 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want a demanding writing class with and a heavy workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkHarsh FeedbackDisorganizedMany Papers
  • Most students describe the class as difficult, assignment-heavy, and stressful.
  • Grading and as .
  • A few students appreciate her knowledge and , but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Students repeatedly say it is not an easy A because papers, reading, quizzes, and .

Both formats describe a difficult grade path, with online reviews adding AI-checker and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels advanced and demanding because of , and strict expectations.

Online reviews emphasize harsh paper grading, while , and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and weekly work, but attendance policy itself is not fully proven.

, while online evidence focuses on required weekly work.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and discouraging feedback.

Both formats are mostly negative, with only a few older or isolated positive online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tough-grader comments dominate, and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress harsh paper grading and AI-checker issues, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and assignments at once.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online reviews focused on papers and discussions and and notes.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews describe her as a few positive comments about knowledge and care.

Format shift

Online students criticize feedback and communication, while in-person students criticize videos, disorganization, and lack of help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear , and discussions rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers and discussions, while , and writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also trend negative, emphasizing lots of , and weak support.

Main concern

, and lack of help.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL1A
“ if you want to pass your classes.”
ENGL1B

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, with complaints about harsh grading, heavy writing, poor communication, and .

Main concern

, and heavy paper workloads.

What students said

“The because she grades live on canvas.”
ENGL1B
“Learning was so .”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and many papers, but do not clearly .

Quizzes MentionedPapers HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mandatory notes, but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, or .

Constant QuizzesMandatory Notes
“ .”
ENGL1A
“Her way of teaching is showing videos and .”
ENGL1A

Online

Online reviews mention papers, discussion work, and AI checking, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown .

Papers HeavyAI Checker Mentioned
“Everything you write will be ran through an ai checker and be accused of ai so have proof.”
ENGL1B
“Two discussion questions due every week, 4 papers and you have to re-do two of them.”
ENGL1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please for your sanity don't ever have Vicki as your teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

18/100

“Any other teacher in the English department a better choice.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“The because she grades live on canvas.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Instead of teaching us she showed us videos.
  • She decides how a story should be interpreted and will argue and try to make you feel stupid.
  • She cares about her students greatly and wants them to succeed in her class!

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS OF HW!
  • Gives a lot of reading and .
  • Two discussion questions due every week, 4 papers and you have to re-do two of them.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • It definitely is not an easy A class, I had to work hard for my grade.
  • She graded and so I never knew what I needed to work on.
  • Shes really a sweet professor too but shes a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 21 reviews across several years and both formats show repeated, detailed complaints.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENGL1A11 reviews
ENGL1B6 reviews
ENG32 reviews
BT1121 review
ENGLISH11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1