AI Rate Professor

History

Lorraine Doria

HIST35 · HIST12 · HIST11 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you like engaging history lectures and can handle steady writing with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesExtra creditHeavy reading and writingCaring but inconsistentRubric concerns
  • Most students praise her lectures as , and engaging.
  • Grades are often helped by , but and slow or rude communication online.
  • The workload is writing-heavy with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

and many A grades make an A realistic, but writing volume and .

Online evidence is more mixed because , while in-person reviews more often describe fair and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The history content is usually made understandable through lectures, but , and .

, but online students report more confusion with assignment expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

it became less mandatory and one online review saying Zoom was not mandatory.

Online evidence supports optional Zoom meetings, while but later loosened.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and support, but repeated online complaints about communication and rubrics lower confidence.

, while online reviews are sharply divided between praise and frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and multiple attempts help grades, but several students describe tough or .

Format shift

Online grading has the most complaints, while in-person .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, notes, weekly assignments, essays, and writing projects.

Format shift

Both formats carry steady work, with online , and essays.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

She is widely described as funny, caring, knowledgeable, and engaging, though some online students report poor communication.

Format shift

, while online teaching is split between organized lectures and response issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to come from writing assignments, discussions, quizzes, midterm or , and some larger projects.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly discussions, quizzes, and essays, while , and weekly work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and manageable work despite lots of notes and writing.

Main concern

The , and .

What students said

“Plus she gives great lectures so it's not hard to understand what's going on.”
Hist-12
“Attendance was mandatory at the start but after the first 2 .”
Hist-11
“ as a .”
Hist-12

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between organized, easy-to-follow lectures with and and weak communication.

Main concern

Students and delayed responses independently.

What students said

“ ”
Hist-12
“ .”
Hist-11
“She does offer lots of and easy to get an A.”
Hist-12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show essay-based and quiz-supported assessment, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring.

EssaysWeekly QuizzesMidtermFinal ExamPaper Analysis

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and weekly assignments, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

TestsMidtermPaperWeekly Assignments
“ ”
Hist-11
“the midterm and the .”
Hist-12

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, mini writing assignments, a midterm, paper analysis, and , but .

Weekly QuizzesMidtermPaper AnalysisFinal Exam
“Weekly video lectures with weekly discussions and a and/or quiz.”
Hist-12
“3 essays: , and .”
Hist-12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very knowledgeable. Lectures are entertaining and fun. She conveys the subject matter clearly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She is very knowledgeable. Lectures are entertaining and fun. She conveys the subject matter clearly.”

⚖️

72/100

“ up requirements as she goes.”

📚 Workload Reality

38/100

“But there is a lot of homework and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are entertaining and fun.
  • She's a really entertaining teacher and makes lectures interesting !
  • She makes it feel much easier and history fun to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She does offer lots of and easy to get an A.
  • As long as and submit it on time, you will pass!
  • Even if you followed it, you'd still get called out for missing secret, unwritten requirements.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • You need to ask through the Q and A Window and .
  • .
  • Rude professor if you have a choice stay away!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 22 recent reviews split evenly across online and and consistent themes.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

Hist-1213 reviews
Hist-118 reviews
Hist-351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1