AI Rate Professor

English

Daniel Caeton

ENGLISH125 · ENGL1A · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you want intensive writing feedback and , and a heavy paper load.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Writing LoadCaring but InconsistentMandatory Participation
  • Recent reviews are , and heavy writing work.
  • , and revision opportunities, but experiences vary sharply.
  • , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible through revisions, , and steady work, but many students report and grade penalties for small issues.

Online evidence points to hard but manageable work, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The writing content itself is manageable for some students, but long essays, reading, discussion, and .

Online reviews emphasize reading and assignments, while and participation pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and check-ins matter directly to passing or grades.

, while online reviews mention check-ins and skip-class risk but less consistently.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recent negative reviews dominate and , and poor learning value.

Online reviews are mixed to moderately positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students , and losing major points even when they understood the work.

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints are strongest in in-person reviews, while online .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly , and long essays.

Format shift

Both formats report substantial reading and writing, with short-term online sections feeling especially compressed.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive reviews praise care and feedback, but many recent reviews .

Format shift

Online students more often praise communication, while in-person students are sharply split and recently more negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear , and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and and discussion grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more polarized, with recent students , and confusing rubrics.

Main concern

Strict grading and .

What students said

“He is really nit-picky, and didn't like.”
ENGL1A
“ grade.”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe a reading-heavy class with , and mixed but often positive support.

Main concern

The workload can feel heavy, especially in short-term or asynchronous sections.

What students said

“There is a lot of reading assignments and video lectures.”
ENGL1A
“You got to work for your grades.”
ENGLISH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and test-heavy tags, but they do not clearly prove a .

Quizzes MentionedEssay-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book exams, proctoring, midterm, or final rules.

Quizzes MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“There is a lot of , and .”
ENGL1A

Online

Online reviews mention assignments, reading, and essays, but they do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is really nit-picky, and didn't like.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ .”

⚖️

20/100

“Almost all the time, no one in class receives a full mark for simple assignments because he will find something to mark you down for.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“There is a lot of , and .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • He is really nit-picky, and didn't like.
  • The lectures are pass fail so like me you can get everything correct, but not elaborate enough and get a 0.
  • He grades hard, so do your work and you will have no problems.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is a lot of reading assignments and video lectures.
  • The essays all have to be at least 6 pages long, with and can rarely get full credit for assignments.
  • Three essays w 2 drafts each, peer reviews and 2 annotated bibliographies.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Genuinely caring and kind, very approachable and and gives thoughtful feedback.
  • and concerned about student needs and truly wants everyone to succeed.
  • He gets back to you pretty fast.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 34 reviews across many years with , and teaching style.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ENGL1A24 reviews
ENGLISH12510 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

2

D 2

F

5

F 5

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 4