AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Marissa Maccaro

PHIL1C · PHIL1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her if and active participation, but be ready for and sensitive class conversations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging topicsParticipation-based gradesDiscussion-heavyMixed classroom comfortClear online workload
  • Positive reviews praise Maccaro for engaging, relevant philosophy topics and encouraging teaching.
  • Grades can be easy when students participate consistently, especially online.
  • Negative in-person reviews raise , and discussion management.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A appears very attainable with steady participation and simple online work, though .

Online evidence strongly supports easy points, while but includes a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students say the material is understandable and relatable, with and instructions than concepts.

Online work sounds simple and structured, while and clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation is important for grades, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Both formats emphasize participation, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

59/100

Recommendations are split because some students loved her engaging teaching while others felt uncomfortable or .

The online review is strongly positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

61/100

Grades can be generous for participation, but one tough grader tag and .

Format shift

Online grading seems easy, while and instructor expectations.

Workload

Light

76/100

Workload appears manageable, with weekly discussions, reading, and .

Format shift

Online workload is clearly light, while but and discussion.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

and encouraging teaching, but negative reviews cite discomfort and .

Format shift

Online teaching is praised, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

26/100

Reviews emphasize discussions, participation, reading, and essays rather than exams.

Format shift

Online assessment is discussion and essay based, and and class discussion.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply split between one excellent participation-based experience and two uncomfortable or .

Main concern

Some students felt classroom discussions or .

What students said

“If you participate each week, you will get an A.”
PHIL1C
“ as well”
PHIL1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online review describes , and easy full points.

Main concern

The online picture is based on only one very positive review.

What students said

“It's easy and .”
PHIL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , so and assessment appears assignment-based.

No Clear Exam EvidenceDiscussion PostsEssays

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Online

The online review mentions weekly discussions and two essays but does not .

Weekly DiscussionsTwo Essays
“Thruout the class there are 2 essays: 1 explaining a topic, 1 giving ur own opinion”
PHIL1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes sure the material she teaches is easy to understand and relatable to current events.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“She makes sure the material she teaches is easy to understand and relatable to current events.”

📈 Grade Effort

76/100

“If you participate each week, you will get an A.”

⚠️ Classroom Fit

59/100

“I felt awkward at times in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is by far the most engaging and encouraging professor.
  • She's an awesome instructor.
  • as well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you participate each week, you will get an A.
  • It's easy and .
  • I feel like if you think different then her she will attack your grade

Theme 3

💬

  • I felt awkward at times in class.
  • there were times where I wish she would have stepped in differnt believes.
  • She gives topics that are relevant to today's issues, like LGBTQ, God, beauty standards, feminism, etc.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because , and the opinions are highly polarized across a small sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1A2 reviews
PHIL1C2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values