AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Anthony Ash

COUN53 · HS24 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
77.27%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a and communication usually pay off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringGives good feedbackInspirationalWriting heavyMostly fair
  • Most students strongly recommend him for being caring, supportive, and motivating.
  • The course often has substantial writing and .
  • A small but clear negative cluster , and canceled sessions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students earn A grades and describe fair support, but the A usually comes through writing, participation, and steady work.

Online evidence shows and heavy writing, while but also workload and grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The material is approachable because he is supportive, but writing volume and reflective expectations keep it from being effortless.

Both formats mention writing, with and challenging experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

and may affect scores, but reviews also mention canceled sessions and format changes, so strictness is inconsistent.

In-person reviews provide the , while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

because , and motivating, despite a few serious complaints.

Both formats are positive overall, but online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

The grade distribution is heavily A-based and students mention grace or , though .

Format shift

In-person reviews contain both the generous-grade pattern and ; online evidence mentions .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Many students succeed, but repeated comments mention lots of , and busy work.

Format shift

Both formats mention a lot of writing, with assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most reviews describe him as , and strong with feedback, with a minority reporting poor organization or AI concerns.

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly positive, while but includes a small negative cluster.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears , and quizzes rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

, while the online review also emphasizes writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive about care, feedback, and inspiration, but several , and canceled sessions.

Main concern

The main concern is workload and , and class delivery.

What students said

“ , and .”
HS-24
“ .”
23466
“ .”
COUN-53

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review praises his clear lectures, quick responses, , and support, but notes a lot of writing.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, and it describes heavy writing despite a high grade.

What students said

“ , and easy to follow.”
HS-24
“A lot of writing in this class”
HS-24

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews discuss quizzes and writing assignments more than exams, and they do not clearly prove a .

Quizzes MentionedWriting HeavyAssignments and PapersExtra Credit Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and assignments, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Quizzes MentionedPapersWeekly AssignmentsDiscussion Boards
“ ”
COUN-53
“Normally 4-5 assignments a week”
23466
“ ”
23466

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Extra Credit MentionedWriting Heavy
“A lot of writing in this class will prepare you for the writing you will do in this profession.”
HS-24
“ .”
HS-24

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Professor Anthony Ash is a great teacher who cares about his students and .”

📈 Effort and Grades

82/100

“ , but he said that's because he wants you to become a better write”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class was not what I expected and a rare teacher who really does care and inspire.
  • Dr Ash also inspires to go for more educational so glad I took his class.
  • Dr. Ash is a decent person but not a good teacher.

Theme 2

📝 About Writing and Workload

  • There is a lot of writing, which can be challenging, but it helps you improve.
  • Normally 4-5 assignments a week
  • Good if you like busy work

Theme 3

⚖️ and Support

  • .
  • .
  • Dr.Ash will work with you if you let him know your issues at hand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 22 mostly recent reviews with rich detail and a consistent positive majority plus identifiable dissenting themes.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HS-2414 reviews
234666 reviews
COUN-532 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 2 · A 14 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values