AI Rate Professor

History

Kathleen Crawford

HIST12 · HISTORY11 · HISTHIST · HISTORY2 · HIST2HIST11 · HIST21 · HIST25 · HIST2 · HIST15 · HIST23 · HIST11 · 82 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
55.17%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Crawford only if you , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture HeavyTough GraderReading IntensiveHelpful but InconsistentExam Heavy
  • Students often describe her as kind and willing to help, but many also find her lectures unclear or .
  • , and reading rather than light participation.
  • Online reviews are much more positive because students describe more flexibility, , and support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A is possible, but students usually need , and exam preparation.

Online reviews describe more and flexibility, while and grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The content is not always conceptually impossible, but the lecture-heavy style, reading load, and .

Online students call the workload easier, while and heavy note-taking.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as essential, and one review says students can be dropped after four absences.

, while online evidence mainly shows flexibility with deadlines and exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend her when they value history, lectures, and help, but many warn against her because of and .

Online students mostly recommend her, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call her a and exams, though some mention and late-work flexibility.

Format shift

as more forgiving, while as strict.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

The workload is not constant busywork, but , and exams require steady effort.

Format shift

Online reviews describe manageable assignment pacing, while and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is often described as kind and knowledgeable, but many students .

Format shift

Online students report stronger communication and support, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are repeatedly described as , and reading assignments also contributing.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams, but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students report a lecture-heavy class with , and a strong need to attend and .

Main concern

Many students say tests and .

What students said

“Her lectures do not match up to the test.”
HIST11
“ and the book.”
HIST11

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students generally report a supportive, flexible class with manageable assignments and .

Main concern

feel easy.

What students said

“Very forgiving. Takes late work and as long as .”
HIST11
“I had only 3-4 assignments every 2 weeks which was easy.”
HIST11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show exam-heavy courses with essays and limited study guides, but do .

Exam HeavyEssay QuestionsOnline Exams MentionedNo Study Guide Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and limited study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Essay QuestionsNo Study GuideIn-Person Written Essay Mentioned
“the and an in .”
HIST11
“she gives no study guides for exams”
HIST11

Online

Online reviews mention exams but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Exams MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Something went wrong with and she still gave me credit because i always turned in work on time.”
HIST11
“Although no matter how many times I studied for the :/.”
HIST11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Sweet lady and will let you turn in late work BUT is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Crawford is so sweet and her lectures are so interesting and easy to follow.”

⚖️

28/100

“Either your work is too informational or not enough, has no middle ground, and .”

🧪

45/100

“No study-guide, she a grumpy old lady, and if you are not a history major or don't already know the history well enough.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • and straight forward on what is expected.
  • Long, boring lectures, unclear, very unorganized, skips topics covered in tests.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • If .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Very forgiving. Takes late work and as long as .
  • .
  • if you struggle in writing(like me) she will work with you one-on-one.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

82

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years and show consistent patterns in , and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 517
3 out of 512
2 out of 58
1 out of 513

Course coverage

HIST1134 reviews
HISTORY113 reviews
HIST152 reviews
HIST22 reviews
HIST212 reviews
Show 6 more courses
HISTORY22 reviews
HIST121 review
HIST231 review
HIST251 review
HIST2HIST111 review
HISTHIST1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 3

B range

13

B+ 6 · B 7

C range

6

C 5 · C- 1

D range

3

D 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1