AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Enid Perez

CLS24 · WSL10CLS10 · WSTS10 · WS1 · CD39 · WOMENSSTUDIES · CLS11 · ETHNST11 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless and only need a potentially easy requirement course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVague instructionsHarsh gradingTech problems onlineReading heavyEasy but frustrating
  • Recent online reviews are strongly negative, citing vague directions, poor communication, late modules, and .
  • Some students still earn high grades because quizzes, discussions, and if they keep up.
  • , so the current risk is mainly poor support rather than impossible content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report A-range grades and , but and harsh zeroes can suddenly punish mistakes.

Online reviews include both easy-A reports and severe grading complaints, while B or A is easy.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The , and projects rather than conceptually hard, though the experience becomes difficult when instructions are vague.

Online difficulty comes more from poor organization and tech issues, while as easy but reading-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not give consistent attendance rules, with participation mattering in some sections and online work dominating others.

Online evidence focuses on due dates and office hours, while but not a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most because they describe rude communication, vague instructions, and weak support.

Online recommendations are especially poor, while and more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some students get high grades and occasional chances, but many , and little chance to fix errors.

Format shift

Online grading complaints are frequent and recent, while and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload can be minimal or easy in some sections, but reading, late modules, scattered due dates, and .

Format shift

Online workload is inconsistent because organization is poor, while but manageable.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Recent comments repeatedly describe poor communication, weak technology use, rude responses, and .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is notably worse, while and include both praise and strong criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears centered on quizzes, discussions, reading assignments, presentations, projects, and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online sections emphasize quizzes, discussions, modules, and projects, while in-person sections , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some easy-grade reports but also long-running concerns , and .

Main concern

The class may be easy to pass but inconsistent in quality and .

What students said

“The professor's class was easy: quizzes and .”
CLS11
“grades unfairly, pushes her beliefs upon you, and disrespectful.”
WSTS10

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about vague , and limited help.

Main concern

Students may not get clear directions or timely support when problems arise.

What students said

“She disabled grade totals so you don't know what grade you have, and she doesn't give instructions or update the syllabus so you don't know what's due or how to do it.”
CLS11
“VERY vague instructions, and grades harshly.”
WSTS10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is inconsistent, with some quiz-heavy sections, one review reporting , and .

Weekly QuizzesNo Final Or Midterm In One Online ReviewResearch ProjectMidterm And Final Mentioned In Older In-Person Review

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, discussions, papers, presentations, and older midterm/final formats, but .

QuizzesDiscussionsOne PresentationMidterm And Final Mentioned
“The professor's class was easy: quizzes and .”
CLS11
“1 midterm and final and they are in the same format.”
CLS24

Online

Online , and one section with no final or midterm, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Weekly QuizzesNo Final Or Midterm In One ReviewExtra CreditResearch Project
“ , but .”
CLS11
“ if you read the book ( questions), lectures and videos were easy too.”
CLS11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly this professor is one of the and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grade ease. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She disabled grade totals so you don't know what grade you have, and she doesn't give instructions or update the syllabus so you don't know what's due or how to do it.”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

78/100

“Easy way to get an easy class over with.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Organization

  • She's not good at technology and shouldn't be teaching an online class.
  • Syllabus wasn't posted until 2 months in the semester.
  • . no change to due date.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • VERY vague instructions, and grades harshly.
  • Vague grading guidelines that entire class struggles to interpret.
  • She let me turn in an .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Ease

  • The professor's class was easy: quizzes and .
  • workload is absolutely minimal discussion boards are 25-50 words.
  • You do need to read a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews provide useful evidence, but opinions span two decades and recent online reviews are much .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CLS1115 reviews
WSTS102 reviews
CD391 review
CLS241 review
ETHNST-111 review
Show 3 more courses
WOMENSSTUDIES1 review
WS11 review
WSL10CLS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 2 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1