AI Rate Professor

English

Erin Fujinami

ENGL1A25333 · ENG1A36712 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can manage a writing-heavy course independently and are comfortable with inconsistent student experiences.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed teaching experienceHeavy writing workloadInconsistent organizationAccepts late workHelpful feedback
  • Reviews are sharply split, with and flexibility while others report poor organization or .
  • The workload can be heavy, especially in online sections with , and long essays.
  • Recommendation strength is uncertain because the sample is small and includes both very positive and very negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A seems possible, but the , and mixed outcomes make it effort-intensive and uncertain.

Online evidence includes both late-work flexibility and , while the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course appears challenging mainly because of , and organization problems rather than concept difficulty alone.

Online reviews provide most difficulty evidence, while the content challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

, but online reviews show flexibility with late work and emergencies.

Online reviews support late-work flexibility, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on the section because students report and serious problems with workload, organization, and fairness.

Online reviews are mixed but include positive support, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and late-work acceptance, but tough-grader tags, an , and weak grade outcomes lower the score.

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed, while the .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report and writing, discussion boards, and a 12-page essay.

Format shift

Online reviews show the heaviest workload evidence, while the and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

and care offset by complaints about cancellations, disorganization, and poor response time.

Format shift

Online reviews range from excellent support to poor management, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears centered on discussion boards, essays, papers, reading, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide most assessment details, while the and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and and unequal treatment.

Main concern

The fairness and treatment of students.

What students said

“ .”
ENG1A36712
“Picks and chooses.”
ENG1A36712

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, ranging from caring and , and poorly managed.

Main concern

Online students may , and uneven communication.

What students said

“There were 38 counted assignments, mostly discussion boards.”
ENG1A36712
“ .”
ENGL1A25333

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, though one online review mentions a and .

Exam policy not clearly provenBook exam mentioned onceWriting assignments emphasized

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy and only supports homework and papers as workload concerns.

Exam policy not clearly provenHomeworkPapers
“ .”
ENG1A36712

Online

Online reviews mention one book exam, discussion boards, essays, and papers, but do not clearly .

Book exam mentioned onceDiscussion boardsEssaysExam proctoring not clearly proven
“Course ask to take a an to read but .”
ENGL1A25333
“There was a 12 page essay as well.”
ENG1A36712

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There was a lot and I mean a LOT of assignments for this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in workload, support, organization, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“There were 38 counted assignments, mostly discussion boards.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload

  • There was a lot and I mean a LOT of assignments for this class.
  • Lots of reading and writing.
  • There was a 12 page essay as well.

Theme 2

💬 About Support

  • Accepts late work and nothing too difficult as long as you follow along
  • she gives lots of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • .
  • Poor management and response time to students.
  • Definitely an opinionated professor and treats her students all differently based on if she likes them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The rating has moderate credibility because only 6 reviews are available, opinions are polarized, and one format has just a single review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A367124 reviews
ENGL1A253332 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1