AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Agnes Rhodes

MATH255 · MTH10A · MATH260B · MATH103 · MATH260D · MATH25538422 · FINITMATH · MATH201 · MATH11 · MTH255 · MATH3A · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80.77%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a supportive math instructor with forgiving grade structures, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring math supportStudy guides mirror examsRetakes and extra creditLots of homeworkOnline organization issues
  • In-person students mostly describe her as caring, patient, and , and .
  • The class content is usually considered easy, but and deadline communication can create avoidable workload.
  • Recent online reviews are sharply worse, citing disorganization, heavy review work, and cheating-related Zoom checks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very , and homework completion, but it is not effortless because workload and deadlines matter.

, while online evidence is split between easy material and recent disorganization.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Most students describe the math content as easy or manageable because she works through examples and .

Both formats mention easy material, but online students more often say the course setup made the easy content frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but several reviews also describe flexibility or low attendance pressure.

In-person reviews mention participation and , while online evidence does not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and grading help, but recent online complaints reduce confidence.

, while online reviews are polarized and recently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

, and study-guide-aligned tests make grading notably forgiving.

Format shift

The , while online reviews provide less consistent support.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and often Pearson-based, but many students say it directly prepares them for exams.

Format shift

Online students complain more about heavy review work and layout, while as useful practice.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise her as caring and helpful, though some report unclear explanations, disorganization, or poor online management.

Format shift

online delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Grades , and participation rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

, and retakes, while online reviews mention Pearson, homework, and some online exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly , and an easy path to passing.

Main concern

Students still need to keep up with homework, class participation, and study guides.

What students said

“She if your score is below a 70% to help bring up your grade.”
MATH3A
“This class was an easy A for me.”
MATH103
“The !”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but severe recent complaints about organization, workload, and cheating checks.

Main concern

and heavy review work despite easy course material.

What students said

“she wasn't very organized in the lay out of the course so i missed deadlines.”
MATH3A
“the online course itself was very easy but so i ended up missing deadlines.”
MATH3A
“Professor Rhodes is wonderful instructor.”
MATH3A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because study guides closely match tests and .

Study Guides Match ExamsRetakes AllowedExtra CreditScantrons In Person

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

83/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as scantron-based or study-guide-based, with retakes and making them forgiving.

Study Guides Match ExamsRetakes AllowedScantrons RequiredExtra Credit
“You will need to buy scantrons for her class for all exams.”
MATH3A
“The !”
MATH103
“ if you score below a 75.”
MATH3A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove a , though one student says Pearson was used for an and recent students mention cheating-check Zoom meetings.

Pearson Exam MentionedCheating Check Zoom Mentioned
“wanted to schedule zoom meetings to confirm you're not cheating”
MATH3A
“Pearson and even to complete an exam online.”
MATH3A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Rhodes is amazing, if you struggle with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Rhodes is amazing, if you struggle with .”

📈 Easy A Path

86/100

“This class is ridiculously easy. If you know how to copy off of the blackboard, you will get an A.”

⚖️

88/100

“She if your score is below a 70% to help bring up your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Agnes is a great teacher. She teaches her students how to do the math rather than showing the math.
  • but u NEED to know your math or u won't pass.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Exams

  • Study guides are accurate to the tests and if you score below a 75.
  • as , so practice your study guide over and over and you will pass.
  • The !

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • she wasn't very organized in the lay out of the course so i missed deadlines.
  • the online course itself was very easy but so i ended up missing deadlines.
  • I had her during Covid19, or anything like that. Just emails and office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 45 reviews span many years, include detailed grade and exam comments, and show a .

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH10313 reviews
MATH3A12 reviews
MATH2559 reviews
MATH2013 reviews
2551 review
Show 7 more courses
FINITMATH1 review
MATH111 review
MATH255384221 review
MATH260B1 review
MATH260D1 review
MTH10A1 review
MTH2551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 10 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

2

D- 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1