AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Mark Aguilar

ACCT4A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and tolerate a heavy workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared instructionExcessive homeworkSelf-teaching requiredAvoid if you need guidance
  • Both reviews are strongly negative and give the lowest quality rating.
  • classes.
  • and classmates had to explain material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students earned B-range grades, but the work burden and weak instruction make the grade costly.

Online evidence points to heavy workload, while as the main cost.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course feels harder because students report excessive work and .

Online difficulty comes from workload, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One in-person tag says skipping class risks failure, and .

The attendance concern comes from the in-person review, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because the teaching is described as unprepared and the workload excessive.

Both online and in-person evidence are negative, though each format raises a different problem.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

There is no evidence of , and students report tough effort for only B-range outcomes.

Format shift

Neither format provides evidence of .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The online review explicitly describes an excessive amount of work and homework.

Format shift

Online evidence directly supports overwhelming workload, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Reviews describe him as unprepared, minimally helpful, and .

Format shift

, while online evidence focuses more on workload.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The and coursework more than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on homework, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and student-led teaching.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves because instruction appears unreliable.

What students said

“This instructor is extremely unprepared.”
ACCT4A
“If you , if not go elsewhere.”
ACCT4A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review reports an excessive workload and no positive teaching support.

Main concern

The workload is described as much heavier than comparable classes.

What students said

“He gives an over excessive amount of work and ”
ACCT4A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy, closed-book rule, or .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you , if not go elsewhere.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“This instructor is extremely unprepared.”

📚 Workload Burden

10/100

“He gives an over excessive amount of work and I have had in my 2 years of getting my AS degree.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“If you , if not go elsewhere.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This instructor is extremely unprepared.
  • Multiplet times a classmate actually taught the class how to do a portion of the lesson with minimal help from him.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • He gives an over excessive amount of work and I have had in my 2 years of getting my AS degree.
  • Lots of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 2 reviews, but both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT4A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values