AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Andrea Romero

HIT1A · AHLTH100 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a supportive professor and , but do not ignore deadlines or weekly online work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and supportiveClear grading criteriaExtra credit availableOrganized structureWorkload can spike online
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Romero as , and willing to help.
  • Grades are usually very attainable when students follow rubrics and submit on time.
  • Online AHLTH-100 has mixed workload reports, from very easy to too much work for a 2-credit class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable because grading is rubric-based, appears, and students report .

Online evidence includes the clearest easy-A proof, while in-person evidence supports easy grades through guidance and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The material is usually straightforward and clearly explained, though some online workload can make the class feel heavier than the content itself.

Online comments split between easy content and heavy workload, while and easy-to-follow lessons.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation and one missed-class issue, but they do not clearly prove a .

, while online reviews focus on deadlines and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students recommend her because , and helps students stay on track.

, but online has one notable workload complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

85/100

Students repeatedly say she , and awards full points for completed work.

Format shift

Online reviews directly say she is not a tough grader, while and .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Work is usually manageable, but , and a final essay.

Format shift

Online workload is more mixed and sometimes heavy, while as time-consuming but passable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students describe her as , and supportive.

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews , and quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online evidence is especially assignment-focused, while in-person HIT1A also centers on homework and modules.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise her clarity, kindness, support, and , with mostly low difficulty.

Main concern

One review reports missed class sessions, but .

What students said

“Everything felt easy to understand”
AHLTH-100
“She guides you through the entire course and helps you with anything you need.”
HIT1A
“She also gives you a chance to earn .”
HIT1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, with and quizzes, but one review says the workload felt too heavy for a 2-credit class.

Main concern

The main risk is weekly online work and .

What students said

“Class is straight forward and not hard.”
AHLTH-100
“She gives a little too much work.”
AHLTH-100
“ ; a .”
AHLTH-100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The easy quizzes and a final essay, making assessment student-friendly.

No ExamEasy QuizzesFinal EssayRubric-Based Grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, webcam use, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Online

Online AHLTH-100 explicitly reports no exam, a few easy quizzes, and a 1500-word final essay.

No ExamEasy QuizzesFinal Essay
“ ; a .”
AHLTH-100
“ and 1500 words”
AHLTH-100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Most understanding professor I've had so far at city college.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Everything felt easy to understand, Professor Andrea played a huge role in making the class enjoyable.”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“Not a , as long as .”

👍 Recommendation Level

91/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The class structure was organized, clear, and and motivated.
  • She guides you through the entire course and helps you with anything you need.
  • She was always very sweet, and willing to help.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Not a , as long as .
  • She also gives you a chance to earn .
  • She gives a little too much work.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She works with you and .
  • She stayed on top of me when I fell behind.
  • She's professional and knowledgeable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Eight recent reviews across both formats are mostly detailed and consistent, with one meaningful online workload complaint.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AHLTH-1004 reviews
HIT1A4 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1