AI Rate Professor

English

Marisol Baca

ENG1AH · ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENG15A · ENG42 · ENGL1 · ENG126 · ENG1B · ENG3H · ENG125 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
73.91%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a structured writing class with feedback and are willing to attend, read, write, and meet deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackReading and papersParticipation mattersStrict deadlinesPassionate but uneven
  • Students often praise Baca as , and .
  • The class , and timely paper submission rather than being a true easy A.
  • Negative reviews focus on strict expectations, late modules or grades, heavy back-loaded work, and occasional disorganization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic for students who attend, read, participate, and , but it is not effortless.

, while online reviews are too few and mixed to generalize.

Is the course easy?

Standard

57/100

The material is manageable for decent writers, but , and participation make it a standard college English workload.

, while online honors comments describe more writing but not extreme difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

because participation, pop quizzes, in-class assignments, and missed work can affect grades.

In-person reviews repeatedly stress showing up, while online reviews do not clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend her because , and helps students improve, despite stricter workload and deadlines.

, while online sentiment is mixed due to the small sample and one clearly negative course review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but not especially lenient, with students saying they must earn the grade and some calling her tough or strict with late work.

Format shift

, while online comments mainly show that communication can help but honors writing still requires effort.

Workload

Moderate

43/100

Workload is moderate to heavy for English, with recurring reading, essays, papers, participation, and sometimes back-loaded assignments.

Format shift

, and attendance work, while online honors reviews also mention significant writing.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students usually , and , though some describe disorganization, late posting, or weak planning.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide broad support for strong teaching, while online and a class feeling neglected.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments and papers, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe a caring and engaging professor who gives useful feedback but , and steady writing work.

Main concern

Students who miss class, dislike reading, or need very flexible deadlines may struggle.

What students said

“Make sure to read because .”
ENG1A
“ and you must be in class on time.”
ENG1A
“easy class just do what is assigned. ”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online evidence is mixed, with one helpful and flexible ENG1A review, one poor ENG42 review, and one honors review describing heavier writing work.

Main concern

The small online sample includes concerns that one class felt neglected and honors writing required significant work.

What students said

“just make sure to communicate with her when you can not turn your work in she will work with you.”
ENG1A
“Class felt like it was on the back burner.”
ENG42
“Its honors so there is more work but just turn in all the assignments and get As and Bs on the essays.”
ENG1AH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and varies by course, with finals or major assessments mainly appearing as papers and .

Research Paper FinalPop QuizzesEssays And PapersReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and major essay finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or exam format beyond writing assessments.

Pop Quizzes10 Page Essay FinalEssays
“Make sure to read because .”
ENG1A
“Her final is a 10 page essay but she gives you an opion to pick your own topic or she gives a list.”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews mention a but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or .

Final Research PaperWriting-Based Assessment
“Final was a 2400 page research paper.”
ENG1AH

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard work but ”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She's very fun in class and .”

📚 Workload Reality

43/100

“ and you must be in class on time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“Ms Baca Is a great professor I had to take her 2 times and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's solid. she's very fun in class and .
  • She is a great teacher. You have to earn your grade but she will give you all the tools you need to pass the class.
  • Ms. Baca is not absolutely terrible, and is rather bearable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard work but
  • Just turn everything in on time, show up to class and you'll be fine.
  • Her class was an easy A but ended the class with a B because I didn't do the homework.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • One thing I didn't like was that the majority of the coursework was loaded into the back end of the semester.
  • There is .
  • Taking her English 1A class . Very cool professor but so much work .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 32 reviews over a long time span, with strong in-person coverage and , and attendance.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A14 reviews
ENGL1A6 reviews
ENG1253 reviews
ENG1262 reviews
ENG1AH2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENG15A1 review
ENG1B1 review
ENG3H1 review
ENG421 review
ENGL11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 10

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1