AI Rate Professor

English

Jason Scroggins

ENG252 · ENG1A · ENG250 · ENGL1 · ENGL125 · ENG126 · ENG125 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
95%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and read but helps you improve.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring writing coachHelpful feedbackReading and essaysFunny and engagingFair grader
  • Students consistently describe him as , and strong at teaching writing.
  • The , and participation, but most students call it doable.
  • Grades are usually fair or lenient when students keep up and ask for help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A is realistic because he grades fairly or leniently, but students still need to read, write, and stay on schedule.

Online reviews explicitly call him lenient and fair, while and homework keep grades on track.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course is approachable because he breaks writing down clearly, though reading and .

Online reviews stress reading volume, while in-person reviews and classroom support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance appears important for participation and guidance, but reviews do not show a .

In-person reviews mention participation and class attendance benefits, while online reviews focus on deadlines and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students recommend him because , and gives useful feedback that improves writing.

Both formats are strongly positive, with online reviews emphasizing responsiveness and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly call him fair, easy, or lenient, though one recent review says instructions and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest lenient-grading evidence, while complaint.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The , and papers, but most students say it is doable with planning.

Format shift

Both formats report reading and writing, with online reviews warning not to fall behind and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and effective at making writing easier to understand.

Format shift

Online reviews highlight feedback and responsiveness, while , and writing coaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and writing assignments rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays, discussion, midterm and , while and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews emphasize engaging teaching, clear writing guidance, humor, and and reading.

Main concern

The class can feel homework-heavy, especially for students who dislike reading or writing.

What students said

“He assigns a lot of work but it is all doable.”
ENG1A
“Teaches you how to write, gives great tips to make writing easy including the research paper.”
ENG1A
“Easy content is needlessly overcomplicated.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise quick responses, thoughtful , and doable but lengthy writing work.

Main concern

Students must keep up with reading and .

What students said

“ and grades fast.”
ENG1A
“There is a lot of reading.”
ENG1A
“ , but sometimes lengthy.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to writing-based assessments, including open-note midterm and .

Open NotesEssay MidtermEssay FinalFew Traditional Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and essay-focused work, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or closed-book testing.

Open NotesEssay-Based Work
“mid and .”
ENG1A
“ , but they are easy and class and .”
ENG125

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe the midterm and final as 2-4 page essays, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Essay MidtermEssay Final
“Midterm/Final 2-4 page essay.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, writing support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Teaches you how to write, gives great tips to make writing easy including the research paper.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Balance

56/100

“He assigns a lot of work but it is all doable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is the .
  • He is funny and caring.
  • and makes things really easy to understand.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing and Feedback

  • .
  • He critiques it to be your own style but written properly.
  • He goes into detail and gives examples on how he wants work to be done.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • There is a lot of reading.
  • He is a , so just write, and you'll score well.
  • , but sometimes lengthy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 37 reviews over a long time span, with detailed and consistent , and writing support.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A18 reviews
ENG1258 reviews
ENG2503 reviews
ENGL13 reviews
ENGL1253 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG1261 review
ENG2521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 10

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1