AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Nihal Orfi

ENGR4 · ENGR2 · ENGR10 · ENGR24179 · ENGR1124179 · ENGR11 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take Nihal Orfi if you want a supportive engineering professor whose classes reward participation, teamwork, and steady completion of manageable work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery forgiving graderGroup project heavyExtra credit availableCaring and supportiveHands-on classes
  • Students consistently describe Nihal Orfi as caring, fun, helpful, and .
  • Grades are very attainable because she is lenient, offers , allows late work, and .
  • The main tradeoff is that many , and hands-on lab time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

An A is highly realistic because reviews mention forgiving grading, , late-work flexibility, retakes, and very easy assignments.

Online reviews emphasize late work and , while , and easy project work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The courses feel approachable because she provides hands-on time and support, but engineering content, math, and .

In-person reviews describe hands-on group work and math-oriented classes, while online and quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation and , but the comments suggest they are useful for class work rather than harshly punitive.

In-person reviews mention participation and attendance much more often, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and invested in helping students pass.

Both formats are strongly positive, with style and classroom experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

Students repeatedly cite late-work flexibility, , retakes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress late submissions and , while and homework forgiveness.

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload is usually light to moderate because much project and .

Format shift

and lab time, while online reviews describe very little time required or flexible submissions.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students describe her as , and focused on student success.

Format shift

In-person reviews strongly praise her classroom energy, while and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades , and group projects than traditional exams.

Format shift

and lab work, while online reviews mention quizzes, assignments, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise her as , and forgiving, with and in-class work time.

Main concern

Students who dislike group projects or participation-heavy classes may find the format less appealing.

What students said

“She is a and .”
ENGR11
“Overall class is super easy and .”
ENGR10
“She gives you a lot of time in lab so we .”
ENGR24179

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe her as understanding, lenient with , and manageable with notes or book support for quizzes.

Main concern

The small online sample mainly supports leniency and support, not a full picture of every course.

What students said

“Since it was an online class you can use the notes and book chapters during the quizzes.”
ENGR4
“She lets you submit late work.”
ENGR11
“So many opportunities.”
ENGR11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are student-friendly because reviews mention review-slide alignment, retakes, notes or book use online, and .

Review-Slide ExamsUnlimited Retakes MentionedOpen Notes MentionedForgiving GradingExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe exams and tests as review-based, forgiving, and sometimes retakable, with .

Review SlidesUnlimited RetakesForgiving ExamsExtra Credit
“Tests in Engr 4 and 11 are all like the .”
ENGR11
“ .”
ENGR10
“ .”
ENGR4

Online

and book chapters, and reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Notes And Book AllowedQuizzesExtra Credit
“Since it was an online class you can use the notes and book chapters during the quizzes.”
ENGR4
“She let you submit late work and even gave a lot of opportunites.”
ENGR11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She has made every class a fun experience and really wants you to succeed.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

99/100

“If .”

⚖️

95/100

“She is a and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She wants you to pass and makes sure you understand everything.
  • She has made every class a fun experience and really wants you to succeed.
  • Drafting can be a dry subject but she makes the lectures funny with her commentary.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • if you find a way to not get an A in this class while trying to pass it it, id be surprised.
  • Overall class is super easy and .
  • She is extremely lenient about late work, easy to pass.

Theme 3

🤝 About Projects And Participation

  • Her and teamwork.
  • There , but it is interesting and the deliverables are manageable.
  • A big part of grade is a 3/4 semester long project be sure to pick a group that is either competent or at least fun to be around.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 18 reviews across several courses are very consistent, though the online sample is small.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR116 reviews
ENGR44 reviews
ENGR103 reviews
ENGR241793 reviews
ENGR11241791 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGR21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 10

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values