AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Deborah Lewis

CD15 · CD39 · CD6 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a caring professor and can keep up with reading, participation, and observations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear gradingReading heavyParticipation mattersSlow online grading
  • and describe her as , and flexible.
  • Online reviews are mixed, with complaints about delayed grading, rudeness, and .
  • Grades are generally reachable, but online students may face more workload and uncertainty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable if students complete the , and observations, though online grading delays can create risk.

and supportive, while online evidence shows more workload and grade uncertainty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is generally straightforward, but reading, observations, and .

In-person students call the work easy, while online students , and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Participation matters, but acceptable.

Attendance flexibility is supported mainly by in-person comments, while online reviews emphasize participation and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and clear, but online communication and grading complaints lower confidence.

, while online reviews are split between praise and frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grades are usually achievable and , but online students report tough or .

Format shift

and flexible, while online grading is less predictable.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but reading, observations, discussions, and .

Format shift

In-person workload is lighter, while online reviews mention lots of , and chapter quizzes.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is often described as caring and knowledgeable, but online students report rude communication and slow responses.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently praised, while online teaching quality is mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

The course , and discussions rather than relying on one assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more quizzes, exams, reading, and papers, while , and online exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe her as , and and open-book online exams.

Main concern

Students , and stay on top of observations.

What students said

“The work you have to do isn't hard.”
CD39
“The and open book, and the textbook is free.”
CD39

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report an easy basic course structure but , and weaker communication.

Main concern

Slow grading and .

What students said

“The class itself is easy and straight forward.”
CD15
“She takes a very .”
CD6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because in-person students report online open-book exams and useful notes, while .

Open Book ExamsOnline ExamsNotes Useful On TestsChapter Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and useful notes for tests and quizzes.

Online ExamsOpen Book ExamsNotes Useful On Tests
“You can .”
CD39
“The and open book, and the textbook is free.”
CD39

Online

Online reviews mention chapter quizzes and multiple exams, but do not clearly prove .

Chapter QuizzesMultiple Exams
“She gives a multiple exams about those chapters.”
CD6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely wonderful professor & person”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“LOVED and a great conversationalist.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“The as long as you do them.”

⚠️ Online Concern

55/100

“She graded everything at the end of the semester so I was shocked to see that my A+ turned into a B+.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and a great conversationalist.
  • Miss Lewis was awesome!
  • and also very good to talk with about assignments and such.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The work you have to do isn't hard.
  • Her class is very requires a lot of textbook reading and class discussion.
  • She also makes three out of eight observations to be turned in, in one day.

Theme 3

📝 About Grades And Exams

  • You can .
  • The and open book, and the textbook is free.
  • She takes a very .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across online and but split evidence, with one older online review reducing freshness.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CD393 reviews
CD62 reviews
CD151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values