AI Rate Professor

History

Laurel Richardson

HISTORY · HIST11 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

She is a strong choice in person and a conditional online choice for students comfortable with reading, writing, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaringOrganized in personWriting heavyMixed online structure
  • In-person students overwhelmingly , and manageable exams.
  • Online reviews are sharply mixed, with several students calling the course unorganized, confusing, and homework-heavy.
  • The class rewards reading, writing, citations, and steady .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A grades are common and revisions or easy exams help, but , and online organization issues require steady effort.

and manageable A path, while online evidence is split between easy and tough.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The and guidance, but history reading, writing, essays, and citations add real work.

In-person students find the course easier and clearer, while online students more often report confusion and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

and lateness is noticed, but she is flexible for emergencies and allows some missed work recovery.

, while online reviews focus on modules, reminders, and weekly work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because , and helpful, though online organization complaints keep it from being universal.

, while online recommendation is sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

She grades reasonably and allows revisions or feedback, but some online students call her tough and expectation-heavy.

Format shift

and supportive, while online grading receives more complaints.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The , and exams, with online students more likely to call it heavy.

Format shift

In-person workload is manageable, while online workload is more often described as tons of .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most students , and caring support, despite several negative online experiences.

Format shift

, while online teaching quality is polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The class and , and exams rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly discussions and essay exams, while , and revisions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing , and exams that are easy when studied for.

Main concern

Students still need to attend, read, write, and .

What students said

“Easy class if you attend lecture and do the work.”
HIST11
“ and easy to follow.”
HIST11

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews range from clear and , and toughly graded.

Main concern

Several online students report confusing organization and .

What students said

“ and the .”
HIST11
“ ”
History

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests a standard but manageable history format, with and .

Essay ExamsMidterm EssayFinal EssayEasy Exams With Study

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy or easy to study for, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Easy Exams With StudyID TermsPrompt Study
“ but you have to study due to the fact that you got to remember ID Terms and the prompt as well.”
HIST11
“ and are easy in general.”
HIST11

Online

Online reviews mention midterm and final essay exams, but do not clearly prove .

Midterm EssayFinal EssayEssay Exams
“ and .”
History
“skill-building assignments to help develop historical critical thinking for the essay exams”
HIST11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class if you attend lecture and do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, , and the online versus in-person split; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Her lectures are easy to follow and posts them online.”

📚 Workload Reality

50/100

“It's history, so there is a lot of reading and writing.”

⚠️ Online Split

55/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She monotoned.
  • She made history class feel like story time I enjoyed it
  • and easy to follow.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Easy class if you attend lecture and do the work.
  • She grades pretty easily.
  • You can .
  • and are easy in general.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • and the .
  • The class was so getting new assignments the day after.
  • Not too bad of a Professor but and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent reviews across both formats provide detailed and consistent evidence of strong in-person teaching and mixed online structure.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HIST1110 reviews
History5 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1