AI Rate Professor

Statistics

Julie Schwanz

PSY42 · 4A · MATH4A · MATH103 · PSYCH42 · PSY4265102 · MATH11 · MATH3A · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
52.94%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her only if , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProKind but inconsistentTest-heavy gradingConfusing lecturesLots of homeworkHelpful when approached
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students finding her caring and helpful and .
  • Grades can be risky because several comments describe test-heavy structures and .
  • Students who , and outside support do much better.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible for prepared students, but , and make it far from easy.

Online reviews show the harshest grade risk, while but still often require tutoring or .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Statistics and math content feels harder because many students say outside resources.

Online complaints focus on weak videos, while and mistakes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and following along are important, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews stress going to class, while online reviews stress keeping up with videos, notes, and homework.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends heavily on learning style because students disagree sharply between caring support and .

Both formats are polarized, with online reviews and very ineffective experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grading often feels strict because tests carry heavy weight and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention very difficult low-question exams, while in-person reviews explicitly cite 80 percent or 70 percent test weight.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and outside tutoring needs.

Format shift

Online reviews describe daily or , while and tutoring dependence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is often described as kind and caring, but many students also report confusing, error-prone, or low-detail lectures.

Format shift

Online evidence is highly polarized, while and recurring clarity problems.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Grades are heavily exam-driven, with .

Format shift

Both formats support an exam-heavy structure, especially online MATH11 and in-person PSY42.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

clarity, heavy reliance on tests, and frequent need for outside help.

Main concern

Students often report confusing explanations, mistakes, or lectures that do not add enough beyond the book.

What students said

“80 percent of . 20 percent is hw.”
PSY42
“This teacher is very ”
PSY42
“ and wants everyone to pass.”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, ranging from very supportive to very poor video instruction and .

Main concern

Weak or short videos and .

What students said

“The "lectures" were almost always videos she had gotten off of youtube that usually only focused on one problem.”
MATH4A
“ and they were very difficult.”
MATH11
“this prof , and extremely helpful.”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because and can be difficult or unforgiving.

Test-Heavy GradingDifficult ExamsLow-Question ExamsNo Midterm Or Final In One Course

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy grading, with one course having tests every two chapters and .

Test-Heavy GradingTests Every Two ChaptersNo Midterm Or Final
“80 percent of . 20 percent is hw.”
PSY42
“ exam only tests every two chapters.”
PSY42
“Math Lab and tests are 70 of your grade”
PSY4265102

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policies, but they describe difficult low-question exams that dominate the grade.

Low-Question ExamsDifficult ExamsExam-Heavy Grading
“Exams were only 7-10 questions but 40 points so you can only miss 1 to get an A.”
MATH11
“ and they were very difficult.”
MATH11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is very , and she is constantly switching up the criteria.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is a wonderful math teach and easy to ask questions to.”

⚠️

34/100

“ and they were very difficult.”

👍 Recommendation Level

52/100

“if you can try someone else.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher is very
  • She never belittles anyone for doing badly
  • She mainly reads from the book.

Theme 2

📈

  • 80 percent of . 20 percent is hw.
  • Exams were only 7-10 questions but 40 points so you can only miss 1 to get an A.
  • If u know the material easy A

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Support

  • She assigned hw everyday
  • i am in the tutoring room everyday good luck
  • semester, and you can retry questions as much as you like.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews cover multiple years and consistently identify polarized teaching quality, workload, and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH114 reviews
MATH4A4 reviews
PSY423 reviews
4A2 reviews
MATH1032 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH3A1 review
PSY42651021 review
PSYCH421 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1