AI Rate Professor

English

Juan Guzman

EGLISH1A · ENGL1B · ENG1A · EGL1A · CLS21 · ELA125 · ENGL125 · ENG3 · EGL125 · ENG125 · 111 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
98.11%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if you want a , and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent FeedbackCaring ProfessorReading And EssaysLenient DeadlinesHighly Recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and helpful with writing.
  • The , and discussion, but and supportive.
  • Many students say attendance and participation matter because class time helps them succeed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Many students report A grades, , lenient deadlines, and passing if they do the writing and show up.

Online reviews suggest a very easy A with , while if students complete reading, essays, and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The courses are accessible and well guided, but and writing.

Online work leans toward discussion boards and papers, while , and class participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

success, even though at least one review says it was not strictly mandatory.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend him because , and .

, though one online review notes email and last-minute assignment issues.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students often mention fair grading, , flexible due dates, and passing with steady effort.

Format shift

Online reviews include and easy grading, while and lenient deadlines.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is manageable but , and papers.

Format shift

Online sections emphasize discussion boards and papers, while , and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and especially .

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, with far more in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and projects rather than traditional tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussion boards and papers, while , and few or no tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person , and willingness to help students improve.

Main concern

Students should expect reading, writing, and .

What students said

“He's very welcoming and .”
EGL1A
“Just show up to class and you'll pass.”
ENG1A
“ .”
CLS21

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly excellent, with strong praise for , and grade support.

Main concern

One online review and assigns work last minute.

What students said

“Mostly discussion board work with 5 bigger papers.”
CLS21
“Hands out like !”
CLS21
“ . Easy class but .”
ENG3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is low because many comments .

Few Or No TestsEssay MidtermTake-Home Essay FinalPapers Instead Of Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often describe papers instead of tests, essay exams, and .

No TestsEssay MidtermTake-Home Essay FinalGroup Project Final
“ .”
CLS21
“ .”
ENGL1B
“ .”
EGL125

Online

Online reviews mention papers, discussion work, and a midterm but do not .

Discussion BoardsPapersMidterm MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Mostly discussion board work with 5 bigger papers.”
CLS21
“ , and midterm.”
ENGL1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . A few essays you gotta write, but he guides you through every one of them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He's very welcoming and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“TAKE HIS CLASS! !”

⚖️

84/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and .
  • He makes sure that everyone in the class understands what he is talking about before he moves on from the subject.
  • Because of .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of .
  • Mostly discussion board work with 5 bigger papers.
  • There are a lot of but you'll live.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Do the work & you'll pass with an A.
  • He's quite lenient on due dates, so it's literally impossible to fail.
  • It's not hard to pass the class, easy A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

111

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 reviews across many years, mostly detailed and highly consistent in praising his teaching and fairness.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 587
4 out of 519
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG12512 reviews
CLS2110 reviews
ENG1A7 reviews
ENG37 reviews
ELA1255 reviews
Show 6 more courses
EGL1A3 reviews
ENGL1B2 reviews
237011 review
EGL1251 review
EGLISH1A1 review
ENGL1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 6 · A 19 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2