AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tiffany Jones

MATH255 · PRE255 · MATH101 · MATH103 · MATH4A · MATH250 · MATH201 · MATH3A · MATH45 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can handle a and do not need flexible pacing or many grade cushions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyHeavy HomeworkStrict AttendanceMixed Teaching QualityHelpful When Asked
  • many older students praise her patience and clarity, while recent reviews criticize workload, testing weight, and strict class management.
  • Getting a good grade can be difficult because tests often dominate the grade and .
  • She may work well for up with homework, and test well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

because exams can dominate the grade and homework often cannot rescue weak test scores.

, while the two online reviews conflict and are too limited for a stable judgment.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content can feel manageable with , but many students report fast pacing and .

because online evidence is only two reviews and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students repeatedly say attendance matters, lateness is criticized, and missed instruction is hard to recover from.

, while one online review also describes strict camera attention.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether the student can learn from examples, keep up with homework, and .

trend, and online reviews are too split to change the overall recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Recent reviews describe heavy test weighting, no notes, no retakes, no , and little ability to recover from low exams.

Format shift

, while online evidence includes one easy-grading review and one harsh monitoring complaint.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and major time demands outside class.

Format shift

, while online evidence is too limited and conflicting.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Many students praise her patience and , but recent reviews describe fast pacing, missing steps, and strict classroom behavior.

Format shift

Older in-person reviews are very positive, but ; online evidence is split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

homework and participation described as support rather than major grade protection.

Format shift

grading, while online reviews only mention exams generally.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews range from excellent older praise to recent complaints , and test-heavy grading.

Main concern

Tests often carry very high weight, and recent students report little room .

What students said

“Tests are 80 percent of your grade”
MATH45
“A lot of .”
MATH45

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is split and one very positive review about helpful teaching and easy homework.

Main concern

Online reviews conflict strongly, especially around monitoring and .

What students said

“always calling you out when you look away from computer or go for a snack or bathroom break”
MATH101
“ and ”
MATH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because many reviews , and strict monitoring in one online class.

No NotesTest HeavyHigh Exam WeightNo RetakesStrict Online Monitoring

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam weight, no notes, and no retakes in recent classes.

No NotesNo Test RetakesHigh Exam WeightWeekly Tests
“No notes for and No .”
MATH45
“77% of your grade is on the tests!”
MATH45

Online

Online evidence includes one review describing strict camera attention and but adjustable, so .

Camera Attention ComplaintDifficult Exams
“have to show full face not half”
MATH101
“ ”
MATH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tests are 80 percent of your grade and there's 25-50 questions worth 2-4 points per.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🧪

86/100

“Tests are 80 percent of your grade”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“A lot of .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Split

62/100

“She goes step by step and makes sure to clear up any confusion about a math problem.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Tests

  • No notes for and No .
  • Most of the grades depended on the
  • so you will need to study in order to get a good grade

Theme 2

📚 And Pace

  • Coursework is too dense for the amount of credits.
  • she demands we spend 12 hours outside of class studying.
  • Lots of information is covered in one class session and at times is hard to keep up.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She was one of the most caring and adaptable teachers I've had
  • she would sometimes not teach a specific step

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, but the pattern is less stable because recent reviews are more negative than older ones.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH10314 reviews
MATH458 reviews
MATH1017 reviews
MATH2017 reviews
MATH2555 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH3A3 reviews
MATH2502 reviews
MATH4A2 reviews
1032011 review
PRE2551 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 5

C range

5

C 4 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1