AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Tech.

Rio Waller

CIT3271 · CIT93 · CIT15 · CIT94 · CIT82 · CIT28 · CTI15 · CIT95 · CIT85 · 197 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
81.4%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Rio Waller if you want strong guidance and , but expect and steady work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear feedbackCaring and accessibleStrict syntax gradingTime-consuming assignmentsBeginner-friendly coding
  • Most students describe Rio Waller as , and highly supportive.
  • Grades are often very strong, but students must follow detailed directions and code syntax closely.
  • A minority of recent online reviews , and heavy stress.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is common when students keep up, follow instructions, and use revision chances, but it is not effortless in stricter coding sections.

Online evidence shows more flexibility and easy-A claims, while but with and workload.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is often beginner-friendly and clearly explained, but coding syntax and SQL details can make some sections challenging.

Online students often call the course easy to follow, while hands-on guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

, and online sections offer scheduling flexibility and late-work options.

Online flexibility is mostly about deadlines and working ahead, while that attendance is not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students strongly recommend her for , and useful feedback despite a small group of severe negative experiences.

, while online reviews are positive overall but more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

She can be strict about details, but many students report , and high grades.

Format shift

Online reviews mention late work and extra chances often, while and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The work is manageable but often time-consuming, especially with , and revisions.

Format shift

Online reviews more often describe time-consuming assignments, while but steady support.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and effective for beginners, though a few call her confusing or unhelpful.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback includes both high praise and sharp complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize homework, , and projects more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus mainly on assignments, with online reviews mentioning quizzes and discussions more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very strong, with , and chances to correct work despite substantial assignments.

Main concern

The and a lot of .

What students said

“ and, if you submit and resubmit.”
CIT28
“It is a lot of work but as long as you keep up with it you will pass.”
CIT15
“SO AMAZING! Such a good professor. Easy A. .”
CIT15

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive for organization, flexibility, and support, but , and unhelpful feedback.

Main concern

Some online students felt grading standards were rigid or confusing.

What students said

“She is easy to work with, and .”
CIT85
“Horrible instructions and .”
CIT28
“Her schedule is very friendly, do accept late work.”
CIT15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove a .

Quizzes mentionedTests mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

No clear exam policy evidence

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove .

Quizzes mentionedTests mentionedNo clear proctoring evidence
“The . The .”
CTI15
“gives constructive and and quiz.”
CIT15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rio is by far the most amazing instructor I've had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and step by step instructions.”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“Everyone speaks of how this class with Rio is an easy A.”

⚖️

76/100

“Can be difficult since Rio expects no mistakes in your code.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her methods are simple and very effective.
  • . You can tell she cares.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • The class is time consuming, but Rio is so thorough and always willing to help.
  • It is a lot of work but as long as you keep up with it you will pass.
  • Easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Horrible instructions and .
  • She expects you to retain every syntax/code taught in all the videos given throughout the course.
  • She never genuinely engages with your requests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

197

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across online and and mostly consistent detail despite some polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5175
4 out of 514
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CIT1530 reviews
CIT935 reviews
CIT284 reviews
CIT854 reviews
CIT823 reviews
Show 4 more courses
CIT32711 review
CIT941 review
CIT951 review
CTI151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 8 · A 16 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1