AI Rate Professor

English

Alisa Lieberman

ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENG1 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Alisa Lieberman only if you can handle heavy writing, risk, and strong independence.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy reading and writingInconsistent feedbackAI-policy concernsPolarized teaching reviewsRewrite opportunities
  • Reviews are sharply split, with older in-person students praising her and and clarity.
  • The course usually requires substantial reading, writing, summaries, and revisions.
  • Grades can be achievable, but students often report confusing directions, unexplained deductions, and strict AI concerns.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students call her an and report A grades, but heavy writing, revisions, and unexplained deductions make the A unreliable.

, while online reviews show more complaints about harsh or unclear grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The English content is not conceptually extreme, but the volume of , and revisions makes it demanding.

Online students emphasize repetitive busy work, while despite the workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation and but do not clearly establish a .

In-person evidence mentions participation and late-work flexibility, while online evidence focuses more on communication and workload.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format and expectations, because praise for caring teaching is balanced and .

, while online students are much more divided or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some students call her an , but many report harsh, petty, or .

Format shift

In-person reviews lean lenient, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, papers, summaries, revisions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly emphasize busy work, while but with more positive learning value.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She can be caring and inspiring for some students, but many , and weak communication.

Format shift

In-person teaching is rated much better than online teaching, where communication and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, summaries, revisions, peer review, and written assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, with online students reporting more repetitive revision work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more positive overall, especially for , and , though one review strongly criticizes grammar and workload.

Main concern

The and writing with .

What students said

“Love this professor. and lets you make up late work.”
ENG1A
“The and the .”
ENGL1A
“Instructions don't make sense and you get attitude when you ask for clarification.”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly critical, citing confusing directions, limited feedback, repetitive work, AI accusations, and heavy writing.

Main concern

Online students and weak communication.

What students said

“ . .”
ENGL1A
“ off 2.5 from everything without any reason or explanation.”
ENGL1A
“ , but and used the tutor resources available.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can say I finished this class with no further knowledge than I had before.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She never corrects assignments in a way that'll help you learn from your mistakes.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“She also gives a ton of homework, so be prepared for a hefty workload.”

⚖️

50/100

“ and lets you make up late work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I loved this class! She made writing fun for me!
  • The and the .
  • I didn't actually learn much.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload And Feedback

  • We do have to write and read quite a bit as one would expect from an English class.
  • Busy work, busy work, busy work!
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️

  • petty with grading.
  • not much reason as .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 22 reviews across both formats and several years, with but strong polarization by format.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENGL1A14 reviews
ENG14 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values