AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Dean

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG1A36176 · ENGL125 · ENG3 · ENG125 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

English class, but avoid online sections if you need communication or real instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy APoor Online CommunicationHelpful In PersonWriting HeavyAttendance Matters
  • Online reviews describe weak communication and .
  • In-person reviews are much stronger, with , and approachable style.
  • The class is usually easy to pass, but reading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A is usually easy if students complete the writing, though online A grades may come with .

Online reviews call it an Easy A despite poor teaching, while students attend and keep up.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The English material is usually described as straightforward, but reading and .

Online students describe low structure and self-teaching, while and doable content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important in in-person sections, while online sections do not show a .

In-person reviews repeatedly say attendance affects success, while and communication problems.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

but strongly criticize her online communication and lack of feedback.

The recommendation pattern is sharply split, with positive in-person experiences and negative online experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Most comments describe easy grading, easy A paths, or a class that is hard to fail, with one serious grade dispute.

Format shift

Online grading looks very lenient but unreliable, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload centers on reading and papers, and some students call it tiring or homework-heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and papers more negatively, while .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Her in-person teaching is praised, but online reviews describe poor communication and minimal instruction.

Format shift

In-person evidence is mostly positive, while online evidence is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and few graded items more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe a and manageable writing work.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“This class is almost impossible to fail, the material is very straightforward and doable.”
ENG3
“just do her work and I guarantee a easy A+.”
ENG125

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report but , and little actual teaching.

Main concern

Students may feel unsupported and on their own.

What students said

“Easy A, but if you want to actually learn.”
ENG1A
“No one in the class was able to get a hold of her till the last week.”
ENG3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mostly writing-based.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyWriting AssignmentsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mainly mention papers, reading, and participation.

Writing AssignmentsReadingParticipation
“A majority of the ”
ENG1A
“We read and did an annotation on an autobiographical essay, and .”
ENGL125

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Graded by few things”
ENGL1A
“So many papers”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A, but if you want to actually learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting the and online communication problems. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and engaging during her lectures, you'd have to be lame to find her class boring.”

📈 Easy A Signal

84/100

“just do her work and I guarantee a easy A+.”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“No one in the class was able to get a hold of her till the last week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and engaging during her lectures
  • Shes a great professor! Shes very understandable and modern.
  • Ms Dean did not grade one single assignment until 7/28, the day AFTER the class ended.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is almost impossible to fail
  • Just do the work assigned and its an easy A.
  • Sometimes she can be strict and , but it helps in the long run.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Be prepared to really read and understand the topic at hand!
  • Easy but VERY tiring class
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across many years show a consistent format split, with , and workload.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A5 reviews
ENGL1A5 reviews
ENG32 reviews
ENG1251 review
ENG1A361761 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values