AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Technology

Tammy Camacho

AT10 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Take her only if you can , and use redo or opportunities.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy WorkloadTough GradingMixed Teaching QualityHelpful When EngagedExtra Credit
  • Reviews are and many complaints about heavy work, weak directions, and tough grading.
  • Getting an A is possible because , and appear often, but students still describe a high workload.
  • Online reviews are mostly negative about directions, quizzes, and homework, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

57/100

An A is reachable through feedback, redos, and , but the workload and .

Online evidence shows more and redo chances, while in-person evidence and tough grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

41/100

The course content may be manageable, but , and many assignments make it feel harder.

Online reviews more often say directions are weak and work is heavy, while in-person reviews range from .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

one in-person review, and participation matters appears in the tags.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, while online reviews do not clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Some students strongly recommend her for help and feedback, but , and .

In-person reviews include the strongest recent praise, while online reviews contain and quizzes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Redo chances and help, but repeated tough-grader complaints and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention and resubmits more often, while in-person complaints focus more on tough or .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews describe lots of , and assignments due on tight schedules.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews most consistently emphasizing workload volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some clear and teaching and poor directions.

Format shift

Recent in-person praise is strong, but online reviews repeatedly criticize weak lectures and lack of directions.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix assignments, papers, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and a , while and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between strong praise for helpful lectures and , and communication.

Main concern

Experiences and communication issues.

What students said

“ and gives many examples on the work she is expecting you to turn in.”
AT10
“Way to much work, she does not grade right at all so because so far .”
AT10

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews , and limited teaching, with a few students praising feedback and redo chances.

Main concern

Students may need to figure out directions with limited lecture support.

What students said

“Gives lots of and videos”
AT10
“The class isnt that bad just a lot to do in so little time.”
AT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Pop QuizzesFinal ExamReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Pop QuizzesFinal ExamReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“Give and doesn't any information”
AT10
“ as study guides”
AT10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class material is shared between all the teachers that teach this class. Class is simple to follow. Just follow the directions and you'll be fine. It seems like a lot of work and it is, but she is lenient about turning work in late and even lets you redo it for a better grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ and lectures.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Gives lots of and videos”

⚖️ Grade Recovery

57/100

“ and chances to fix them to improve your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and gives many examples on the work she is expecting you to turn in.
  • Needs to give out more lectures and
  • Very difficult to understand with lack of directions given.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You can submit everything in advance and re submit for a better and rubric.
  • This professor wasn't the grader
  • Class is too hard it should made to be easier for students

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • Really liked this class, If you need any help reach out because and .
  • Very disrespectful, very rude, very unprofessional, hard top communicate with,

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years give enough evidence, though opinions are polarized and some comments are vague.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 510

Course coverage

AT1016 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values