AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Jason Mullikin

AUTO9 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
5.26%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid this professor unless no alternative exists and , and high uncertainty.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GradingPoor CommunicationLow RecommendationHigh StressHard Exams
  • Most reviews describe , and hostile classroom experiences.
  • Grades are mostly low or withdrawals, and students repeatedly say emails are ignored or .
  • One older positive review praises his trade knowledge, but it is overwhelmed by many recent negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears extremely difficult because as harsh, and many students report failing or dropping.

Both online and in-person reviews describe damaging grading, with in-person evidence much stronger because it has far more reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

, but , and stressful grading make the course challenging overall.

Online evidence focuses on organization and , while and weak lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation matters appears in older in-person tags.

, so the evidence is inconclusive.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

Students overwhelmingly discourage taking him because of , and negative classroom interactions.

Online and carrying the strongest pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly describe , and work graded unfairly.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews repeatedly describe harsh and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload complaints appear often, though the and poor communication rather than assignment volume alone.

Format shift

and papers more often, while online reviews focus on late-posted assignments.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Most comments describe poor communication, lack of support, unprofessional behavior, and little learning value.

Format shift

Online and in-person review praising his experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention homework, assignments, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and whole-course grading, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative about grading, communication, attitude, and classroom respect, with only one strong older defense.

Main concern

, and stressful interactions.

What students said

“Very unprofessional, makes you dislike school. Bad communication skills.”
AUTO9
“Good instructor. Has a wealth of knowledge and experience especially with GM vehicles on account of being a GM Master Technician.”
AUTO9

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews report poor , and no clear care for student learning.

Main concern

Students may receive little response or guidance online.

What students said

“ .”
34544
“Posts assignments 6 hours before they are due.”
34544

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but , and reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policies.

Hard TestsMaterial Not CoveredReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and included material not covered, but does not prove proctoring or .

Hard TestsMaterial Not Covered
“ and included material not covered in lecture.”
AUTO9

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , you will waste a class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

6/100

“ , you will waste a class.”

⚖️

5/100

“Will grade you on how he likes you”

📩 Communication

8/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are incredibly boring.
  • Good instructor. Has a wealth of knowledge and experience especially with GM vehicles on account of being a GM Master Technician.
  • Very inexperienced. Has never actually been a tech in the real world before.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • This teacher does not believe in a perfect score
  • Grades all the work in the same day, my grade dropped from, 100 percent to a 43%
  • Nothing is graded correctly.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • Very unprofessional, makes you dislike school. Bad communication skills.
  • .
  • Has a hard time replying to student emails.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews over a long span give strong volume, and recent comments are highly consistent despite some emotional wording.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 518

Course coverage

AUTO914 reviews
345446 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

3

D+ 2 · D- 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 2 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1