AI Rate Professor

Criminology

Terrence O'Neil

CRIM3 · CRIM1 · CRIM6 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a practical criminology class and , and active participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy ReadingParticipation MattersUseful Study GuidesLaw Enforcement Focus
  • Students often respect his real-world experience, but as strict.
  • Reading, discussions, and participation drive much of the workload.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because communication and structure are weaker there.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and studying for exams.

Online and , but online students describe more self-management and communication risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The criminology content is manageable, but long readings, research-based discussions, and .

In-person reviews more often call the class simple with study guides, while online reviews emphasize long ebook chapters.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation is repeatedly valued, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person evidence mentions participation more directly, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Most positive reviews recommend him for practical learning, but and weak communication create real hesitation.

In-person reviews are more favorable, while online reviews are more mixed and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students frequently call him a and .

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, with and discussion expectations.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The , and research-based writing.

Format shift

Online reviews stress long ebook chapters, while and discussion research.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many students respect his knowledge and real-world focus, but some find lectures boring or communication weak.

Format shift

, where email responsiveness is a major concern.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Grades , and exams rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online evidence highlights homework discussions, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe him as respected and often engaging, but , and .

Main concern

and required preparation can punish students who do not read closely.

What students said

“ , but if you pay attention to his lectures and !”
CRIM6
“Reading the required text is mandatory in and learn the material for the exams.”
CRIM3

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and weaker communication.

Main concern

Students and long reading-heavy chapters on their own.

What students said

“This professor never answers his emails, specifically when it's as fast as possible.”
CRIM3
“Some chapters are incredibly long an tedious, like around 35 pages, others can be around 15 pages.”
CRIM6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe study guides and generally manageable tests, but also short time limits and .

Study GuidesMildly Easy TestsShort Exam Time LimitsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, and short exam time limits, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Study GuidesEasy ExamsPop QuizzesShort Exam Time Limits
“ ”
CRIM1
“Time limits for the so you must study to do well.”
CRIM3

Online

Online reviews mention mildly easy tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policy.

Mildly Easy Tests
“ , but you gotta know your stuff as well.”
CRIM3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but if you pay attention to his lectures and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“He wants to prepare you for the real job if you are planning to work as a Law Enforcement.”

⚖️

34/100

“ . Cannot BS through this class.”

📚 Reading Load

35/100

“There is so and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was very funny in lectures and told us lots of stories from when he was in the field.
  • There are times where the lectures seem long and boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He likes things done a specific way when it comes to the .
  • If you answer the weekly discussion posts thoroughly, supported by research you will do well.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • You follow the ebook heavily.
  • and need to do your research.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 15 recent reviews across both formats with , and participation.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CRIM38 reviews
CRIM64 reviews
CRIM13 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1