AI Rate Professor

English

Anna Boyle

ENG252 · ENGL1A · ENGLISH252 · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENGLISH125 · ENG125 · ENG251 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
9.38%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you specifically want a very strict, writing-heavy class with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderEssay HeavyStrict AttendanceUnclear ExpectationsLow Recommendation
  • Students overwhelmingly describe grading as .
  • , and expectations are unclear or inconsistent.
  • , and exact formatting can carry severe penalties.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

6/100

Getting an A appears extremely difficult because reviews repeatedly report very , and few students passing.

Both formats show severe grading risk, with online reviews stressing grade recovery problems and and drops.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

English 1A and 125 are described as far harder than expected because , and and unforgiving.

In-person evidence is much larger, but and grading as unusually punishing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

Reviews explicitly describe strict absence rules, mandatory tutor sessions, and .

In-person reviews cite being dropped after absences, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

9/100

Students overwhelmingly say not to take her because of , and discouraging interactions.

Both online and positive comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

3/100

The dominant theme is extremely harsh grading, especially on essays, with multiple reports of very low class averages.

Format shift

Both , and in-person reviews include repeated claims that very few students passed.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The , and participation demands that students find time-consuming.

Format shift

Online evidence highlights mandatory tutoring and essay weight, while , and attendance demands.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe unclear instruction, poor communication, rude interactions, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide extensive negative teaching evidence, while online reviews .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and assignments, with and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students overwhelmingly describe a and strict attendance consequences.

Main concern

Students report failing or dropping despite effort because grading and expectations feel unforgiving.

What students said

“She failed half of her entire class.”
ENGL1A
“She dropped you if u absent 3 times and of absent.”
1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report , and little grade recovery.

Main concern

Small grading penalties and after major effort.

What students said

“Grade tanked and couldn't bring it back no matter how hard I tried.”
1A
“She has MANDATORY tutor sessions for a grade, 0 if you didn't go.”
1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, but and handwritten tests.

Essay HeavyQuizzesHandwritten TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and handwritten tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

QuizzesHandwritten TestsEssay Heavy
“ ”
ENGL1A
“ and NO multiple questions.”
ENGL1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Such a miserable professor with an incredibly rude demeanor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

3/100

“No one in our class was getting above a 66% for each of our essays.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

9/100

“Save your GPA and .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Experience

18/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

📝

  • Believe the previous reviews. .
  • She will mark one thing wrong on a 6page paper and give you a 60%.
  • Not one person in her class received an A .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Class Policies

  • She dropped you if u absent 3 times and of absent.
  • She has MANDATORY tutor sessions for a grade, 0 if you didn't go.
  • .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Communication

  • Very brief and non meaningful lecture posts
  • She is very unorganized, will tell you things are ready to be picked up then she never shows, will change things last minute.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 50 reviews across many years with unusually , and recommendation.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 535

Course coverage

ENGL1A19 reviews
ENG12510 reviews
1A9 reviews
ENGLISH1254 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
Show 5 more courses
322121 review
ENG 1251 review
ENG2511 review
ENG2521 review
ENGLISH2521 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

5

B 4 · B- 1

C range

10

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 7

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

7

F 7

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3 · Rather_Not_Say 1