AI Rate Professor

Art History

Susana Sosa

ART5531051 · ART5H · ART60 · ART50 · ART55 · ART6 · ART18459 · ART55691672024F · FILM2A · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless , and manage unclear expectations without much support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLate gradingPoor communicationUnorganized lecturesHeavy memorizationHarsh grading
  • Students across both formats and little visibility into their standing.
  • Many comments describe confusing, fast, or and .
  • The course can still produce high grades for some students, but the stress and communication failures make the experience poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students received As, but , and late grade posting make the A feel stressful and unreliable.

Online and students especially focused on late grading and in-person students on memorization and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content becomes difficult because , and poorly aligned with posted materials.

Online students cite disorganized layouts and , while , and image memorization.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and participation appear important, and .

In-person evidence clearly supports strict attendance value, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

4/100

Students overwhelmingly say not to take her because of , and disorganized teaching.

Both formats are strongly negative, with online reviews emphasizing ghosting and in-person reviews emphasizing lectures and classroom experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or harsh grader and .

Format shift

Both formats report grading problems, with online students especially affected by grades posted near the end of the semester.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Workload often includes heavy , and catch-up assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention heavy weekly work and papers, while , and lecture-heavy preparation.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Comments consistently describe poor communication, disorganized lectures, confusing expectations, and little effective support.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for ghosting and late posts, while in-person teaching is criticized for passive aggression, fast lectures, and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and assignments rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, discussions, papers, midterms, and finals, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report passive aggression, , and heavy memorization.

Main concern

Lecture organization and track progress.

What students said

“PLEASE RUN honestly anyone will be better”
ART55
“I practically taught myself EVERYTHING.”
ART55691672024F
“ ”
ART55

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe ghosting, delayed grading, , and .

Main concern

Students may not know grades or deadlines in time to adjust their performance.

What students said

“Ghosted us for about 1 month then gave a ton of work to catch up with her lacking to teach the class.”
ART50
“Dont expect to know how youre doing in class, she doesnt grade anything ever.”
ART18459
“there is an incredible amount of homework.”
ART6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and demanding assessments with long exams, image memorization, and , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Heavy MemorizationLong ExamsEssay Midterm PortionQuizzes And Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and difficult midterms, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Heavy Image MemorizationQuizzes And ExamsDifficult Midterm
“you HAVE TO remember every single image of art for quizzes & exams.”
ART55691672024F
“The work that she assigns and the .”
ART5531051

Online

and written responses, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Long ExamsEssay Midterm PortionMultiple Choice Questions
“ and you are expected to write 2-3 paragraphs for multiple art pieces on top of doing ~50 multiple choice questions.”
ART6
“this only gave the class 3 days to prepare for the finals”
ART50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“PLEASE RUN honestly anyone will be better”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ she posts on canvas, goes over them way too fast for anyone to even comprehend what we're learning”

⚖️

14/100

“she doesnt grade anything ever.”

⚠️ Workload Stress

24/100

“there is an incredible amount of homework.”

Theme 1

📉

  • she's very late to grade things
  • Dont expect to know how youre doing in class, she doesnt grade anything ever.
  • she only graded 1 thing out of 7 assignments.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are so long and unorganized.
  • . she's all over the place
  • Her lectures were very confusing and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • .
  • .
  • she ghosts her students to the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 23 reviews across online and in-person formats from 2016 to 2025 with unusually consistent negative patterns.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 57
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ART558 reviews
ART605 reviews
ART184592 reviews
ART502 reviews
ART55310512 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ART55691672024F1 review
Art5H1 review
ART61 review
FILM-2A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2