AI Rate Professor

English

Sallie Saiz

ENGL48A · ENG1A · ENGLISH40 · 252ENGLISH · ENGLISH1A · ENGL1 · ENGL15B · ENG125 · ENGL46A · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
15.63%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid Saiz unless you can manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy writing workloadLate gradingPoor communicationConfusing expectations
  • Students overwhelmingly describe disorganization, unclear directions, and .
  • The class content is often not intellectually hard, but the experience becomes difficult because expectations shift or stay vague.
  • Some students earned A grades and mention kindness or , but most still warn strongly against taking her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earn A grades and mention , but , and vague expectations make the A unreliable.

Both formats show possible high grades, but online and and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The English content is often described as easy or basic, but poor organization makes the course feel harder than it should.

In-person reviews most often say the class itself is easy but confusing, while online reviews emphasize workload over content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students report strict attendance treatment, including being counted absent for arriving late and needing class presence to keep up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students advise avoiding her because , and workload are consistently poor.

Both online and few older or isolated positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

appears in some reviews, but late, unclear, and .

Format shift

The and are especially common in in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Students repeatedly mention too , and hours of homework.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with online reviews also citing very high weekly time expectations.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The dominant pattern is disorganized teaching, vague directions, poor communication, and .

Format shift

Both formats show weak teaching experience, with in-person reviews supplying the larger and more consistent evidence base.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Reviews focus on papers, reading, discussions, assignments, and .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, confusing, late with grades, and assigns too much reading and writing.

Main concern

The and delayed grading that leaves students unsure where they stand.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL1
“the class itself shouldn't be hard but she's hard to work with”
ENG1A
“you're practically clueless on where you stand.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mainly report too much work, , and poor email response.

Main concern

The main concern is high workload with little communication or .

What students said

“ , and assigns far too much”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENGL46A
“ and assigned stuff last minute.”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays, papers, readings, and assignments, and they .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyPapersAssignmentsFinal Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one test prompt, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam format.

PapersAssignmentsTest Prompt
“ fifty times”
ENG1A
“ due.”
ENGLISH1A

Online

Online reviews mention essays, papers, and a final timing issue, but do not clearly .

EssaysPapersFinal Mentioned
“three essays and has only started grading the first one the ”
ENGL46A
“Only had to write a few papers though”
ENGLISH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ as her "lecture" aka she doesn't actually teach.”

📚 Workload Pressure

16/100

“assigns 6hrs of ”

⚖️

30/100

“you're practically clueless on where you stand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she cant really teach and most of her stuff doesnt make any sense

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • assign 6 hours of work.
  • assigns far too much, even for people who are hard-working students.
  • triple the amount of homework

Theme 3

⚖️

  • due.
  • never checked her emails
  • Grades arrive far too late.

Theme 4

👍 Positive Exceptions

  • She gives out so much so .
  • .
  • she works with you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-four reviews over many years show unusually consistent , and poor communication.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 511
1 out of 524

Course coverage

ENG1A22 reviews
ENG1255 reviews
ENGLISH1A5 reviews
ENGL14 reviews
ENGL15B4 reviews
Show 4 more courses
252 ENGLISH1 review
ENGL46A1 review
ENGL48A1 review
ENGLISH401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1