AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Daniel Kwasniewski

CHEM3B · CHEM3A · CHEM1A · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
96.15%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a supportive chemistry professor who makes and steady help.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExceptional chemistry teacherVery caringClear explanationsHigh supportSome homework load
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and unusually supportive.
  • Chemistry can still be hard, but he breaks concepts down and offers many ways to get help.
  • Grades are very achievable for students who do the homework and use his review resources.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very realistic because , and , but students still need to do the chemistry work.

Online evidence mentions dropped low scores and a , while in-person evidence more often , and support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The chemistry content is not effortless, but and review resources make difficult topics easier to learn.

Online reviews call the course tough but doable, while down.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

and participation, but the comments do not show a consistently strict attendance penalty.

In-person reviews emphasize showing up for better understanding, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students recommend him because he teaches clearly, cares deeply, and gives extensive help outside class.

Both formats are positive, but the and more enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

He is not a free-grade professor, but dropped scores, late-work flexibility, exam autopsy, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions dropped lowest grades, while , and clear exam expectations.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The , and exams, but many students say it helps them learn rather than feeling pointless.

Format shift

, while online evidence mainly highlights the compressed course structure.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe him as , and able to make chemistry understandable.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with much stronger and richer support from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and practical or team assessments rather than only one format.

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly lists exams, a lab practical, a final, and team assessments, while , and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

explanations, office-hour help, and ability to make chemistry understandable.

Main concern

Several students mention lots of while recommending him.

What students said

“Dr Dan is an incredibly gifted instructor.”
CHEM1A
“He made Ochem understandable”
CHEM3B
“chemistry is hard, but Dr. Dan breaks it down until you get it.”
CHEM3A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise his videos and support, while the accelerated summer course still felt tough but doable.

Main concern

The online evidence is limited and one review describes a compressed four-week course with many assessments.

What students said

“It was TOUGH but it was DOABLE.”
CHEM3A
“Love this guy's online videos!”
CHEM3A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show exams are regular but well supported through clear expectations, reviews, study resources, and some grade-friendly policies.

Lowest exam droppedTeam examStudy guidesExam reviewsUnlimited quiz attempts

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and supported by reviews or study guides, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Clear exam expectationsExam reviewsStudy guidesUnlimited quiz attempts
“He is very clear about what and what to study.”
CHEM3B
“He hosts zoom reviews for exams and created a YouTube channel to help students.”
CHEM3A

Online

Online reviews mention four exams, a lab practical, a final, team assessments, one team exam, and a dropped lowest exam score, but .

Four examsLab practicalFinalTeam examDropped lowest exam score
“Dr. Dan had 4 exams, 1 lab Practical, and 1 final.”
CHEM3A
“1 exam was a .”
CHEM3A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr Dan is an incredibly gifted instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He makes things fun, and does a good job at showing how chemistry is applicable in the real world.”

👍 Recommendation Level

97/100

“ ”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“It's hard to fail his class unless you don't study, do HW or not put any effort.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr Dan is an incredibly gifted instructor.
  • He made Ochem understandable
  • Dr.Dan made learning chemistry much easier than any other professor I know.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • He really shows how much he cares about us as individuals.
  • and always helping everyone!
  • He never puts you down or makes anyone feel dumb for asking a question

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • dr dan gives alot of homework, but it really made me feel like I actually understood chemistry for once.
  • He lets you turn in late work.
  • Chem is not easy so work hard and study.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 26 recent reviews across multiple chemistry courses are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM3A16 reviews
CHEM3B7 reviews
CHEM1A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

15

B+ 3 · B 12

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1