AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Technology

Thomas Collins

CIT15 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you and tolerate strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing directionsTough graderLong off-topic lecturesLimited helpCostly software
  • and lectures that do not help with the work.
  • Students report tough or an A is easy if assignments are on time.
  • Online and , though the only strong positive review is online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One online review says an A is easy with punctual work, but and .

The only easy-A evidence is online, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content may be manageable, but unclear wording and .

Online and online review calling the class easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking him because , and .

Both formats trend negative, with online containing the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly describe tough or and .

Format shift

In-person reviews directly say he is tough, while online reviews describe harsh comments and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Assignments appear stressful because directions are hard to understand and lectures do not align well with the work.

Format shift

Both formats cite long lectures and .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students often describe lectures as .

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both criticize clarity, though .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments focus mainly on assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe hard-to-follow , and paid buggy software.

Main concern

Lectures and instructions .

What students said

“100% pick someone else.”
CIT15
“ .”
CIT15

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing micromanaging, confusing instructions, off-topic lectures, and little help.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“ and all over the place.”
CIT15
“Easy class with him.”
CIT15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“100% pick someone else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

30/100

“ , most assignments are based on instructional docs that are always hard to understand.”

⚖️

25/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“100% pick someone else.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Micromanaging and longwinded
  • Lectures are riddled with attempted humorous comments directed towards students that come across as demeaning.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Be on time with assignments and you'll easily get an A.
  • and degrading if it's not a perfect score.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews across both formats are consistent enough to trust the negative pattern, but the sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CIT156 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2