AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jacquelyn Fargano

PSYCHJKLA · PSYC2 · PSYC100 · PSY426 · HUB440 · PSY229496 · PSY221909 · PSY2 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can self-manage, write well, and handle limited communication; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationDiscussion-heavy workloadPicky gradingEasy if organizedGroup projects
  • some call the class easy and organized, while many describe poor communication and .
  • Online students especially complain about delayed replies, , and heavy writing expectations.
  • The course can still produce A grades for and tolerate discussion-board work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible for organized students, but , and strict deadlines make it more than a low-effort grade.

Online reviews are more polarized and self-taught, while and tough-grader complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The concepts may not be very hard, but the course feels demanding because of , and writing standards.

Online reviews emphasize workload and communication problems, while and labs in some older sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation matters in many reviews, but one in-person review says she does .

Online evidence points to strict participation and deadlines, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation depends heavily on independence because many students criticize communication and grading while others find the class simple if they follow the syllabus.

Online reviews lean more negative due to communication problems, while and course setup.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

as picky or arbitrary, especially for writing, citations, grammar, and discussion-board expectations.

Format shift

, though some online and in-person students still earned A grades by meeting the syllabus requirements.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, lengthy , and videos.

Format shift

Online workload is more frequently criticized as heavy and self-directed, while projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is dragged down by repeated complaints about , and copy-paste feedback.

Format shift

Online reviews most strongly report poor communication, while and available to unavailable and arbitrary.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment is mainly built around discussion boards, papers, homework, group projects, quizzes, labs, and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress discussion boards, essays, and group projects, while , and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews range from easy and open-book to tough, picky, and ones.

Main concern

Picky grading and .

What students said

“you'll consistently lose 20% of your grade and have absolutely no idea why.”
PSYC2
“Overall easy A.”
PSY2

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but often negative, citing weak communication, , and strict or .

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves and .

What students said

“I taught myself, she had no part really.”
PSY2
“i thought this was a and quizzes but all very simple straigth to the point”
PSY2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly where described, with , though many reviews focus more on assignments than exams.

Open Book QuizzesOpen Note TestsNot Timed TestsFinal MentionedBook-Based Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests and easy book-based tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring rules or closed-book exams.

Open Note TestsOpen Book TestsBook-Based Tests
“ easy.”
PSYC2
“The 4 tests and .”
PSY2

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention open-book quizzes and not-timed tests, but they do .

Open Book QuizzesNot Timed TestsFinal Mentioned
“Works with students and .”
PSY426
“ .”
PSY2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I taught myself, she had no part really.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“shes an absolutely horrible teacher.”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“Besides the numerous LENGTHY discussion boards that you only get 10 points for; .”

⚖️

34/100

“Will mark you down for completely arbitrary reasons if she doesn't like you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Communication

  • She rarely communicated and when she did her messages were condescending and unhelpful.
  • She rather would never answer my emails or would only answer half.
  • She is awesome. Do not pay attention to the other bad reviews, she does get back on time and within good timing.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • This course does has a lot of reading and and analyzing videos (you will see).
  • The work load consisted of discussion boards, homework, a 4-5 page essay, a group powerpoint, and the final.
  • i thought this was a and quizzes but all very simple straigth to the point

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • Fargano isn't a , however I'd say that she is very picky with what she wants in discussion boards and in papers.
  • The reviews on here almost made me wait until next semester but the bad reviews are wrong. Class is an easy A IF you do your work.
  • She is very picky with what you write on the discussion board.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 34 reviews across many years provide detailed and , and communication patterns.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

PSY223 reviews
PSYC1003 reviews
PSYC23 reviews
HUB4401 review
PSY2219091 review
Show 3 more courses
PSY2294961 review
PSY4261 review
PSYCHJKLA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 5 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2