AI Rate Professor

English

Anthony Brantley

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG15B · ENGL125 · ENG125 · ENGL001 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with reading, essays, and class participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackCaring and flexibleReading and writing heavyEngaging lecturesOccasional tough grading
  • , and genuine care for student progress.
  • Most students say the grade is very manageable if , and participation.
  • The main risks are heavy reading or writing in some sections, political themes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is very realistic if , and participation, with late work and helping in many sections.

Both formats support a manageable A, but online has more complaints about homework while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course content is usually approachable because , but reading, essays, and .

Online comments range , while in-person comments more consistently describe useful but .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, and peer review, but online Zoom meetings were explicitly described as not mandatory in one review.

Online evidence mentions optional Zoom meetings, while and success.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because he is caring, engaging, and .

, while online reviews remain positive but include a few sharper concerns about theme and workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

73/100

Many students report easy or , and , though several older reviews call him tough.

Format shift

Online evidence leans flexible and doable, while and occasional tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is usually manageable but , and smaller writing assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews include both doable work and one strong homework complaint, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and .

Format shift

, but in-person reviews provide stronger evidence of engaging classroom teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment , and peer critique rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly emphasize caring teaching, useful feedback, engaging lectures, and a fair path and attendance.

Main concern

, and required reading.

What students said

“If you show up and turn in the .”
ENGL1A
“He makes the class interesting and gives lots of .”
ENGL1A
“Awful, he .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, with and flexibility, but one ENG1A and another dislikes the course theme.

Main concern

Online students may face heavy reading, homework, or theme-driven lectures depending on the section.

What students said

“I learned a lot in this class and Mr. .”
ENG15B
“Professor Brantleys English 1A course was super fun and easy.”
ENG1A
“He gives out an INSANE amount of homework and makes you learn debate methods of arguing.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe essays and writing assignments, and they do not clearly prove a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyEssay-based assessmentPeer critique

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and quizzes on reading, but do not clearly prove a full exam policy.

Essay-based assessmentReading quizzes mentioned
“Expect and a .”
ENG1A
“Textbooks are a must and .”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up and turn in the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ , and truly passionate about teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

86/100

“ .”

⚖️

73/100

“He takes them late and if they're well done he gives you full credit, even if they're pretty late.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes the class interesting and gives lots of .
  • His lectures are very interesting as well as the material he chooses to show the class.
  • He would teach us how to write and read in ways to make it easier !

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Make sure !
  • There is a lot of but it wasn't too intense.
  • He gives out an INSANE amount of homework and makes you learn debate methods of arguing.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • If you show up and turn in the .
  • Expect , but it will help you out in the long run.
  • Doesn't grade too hard and gives out now and then.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 27 reviews across many years and both formats, with , and flexibility.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A14 reviews
ENGL1A8 reviews
ENG1252 reviews
ENG15B1 review
ENGL0011 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values