AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cher Yang

MATH201 · MATH255 · MATH103 · MATH11 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are already strong in math and can teach yourself when lectures do not help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast-paced lecturesHard to understandHomework-exam mismatchHelpful when askedSelf-teaching required
  • Most negative reviews say lectures are fast, hard to understand, and not enough preparation for .
  • A few students found him helpful and manageable if they were already comfortable with math.
  • and inconsistent curves, with little support for student-friendly testing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible for strong math students, but many reviews describe heavy self-teaching, , and .

Online evidence is negative but limited to one review, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The math itself may be manageable for prepared students, but the fast pace and .

Both formats point to difficulty, with and unclear teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as strictly mandatory, but , and participation support make showing up important.

The , while in-person reviews suggest attendance helps but does not prove a strict rule.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most students do not recommend him because they found his teaching unclear and .

The , and the in-person reviews are mostly negative with a few positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

49/100

There is , and , but exam preparation and grading feel inconsistent to students.

Format shift

, while the online review does not mention leniency.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report lots of homework and .

Format shift

Both formats mention homework difficulty, with reliance.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

He may offer help when asked, but repeated comments describe lectures as , and hard to learn from.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both criticize teaching clarity, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and exams, but student concerns focus heavily on exams.

Format shift

, and dropped exams, while online evidence only mentions lecture-homework mismatch.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly , and exam difficulty, with a few students praising his help.

Main concern

Students who need slow explanations or interactive teaching are likely to struggle.

What students said

“Goes too fast. Doesn't like questions to be asked.”
MATH255
“He helps as much as you need.”
MATH103
“You will learn more from mymathlab homework than you will from his lectures.”
MATH201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review strongly discourages the class because lectures and .

Main concern

Online students may have to bridge a large gap between lectures and .

What students said

“ on his lectures.”
MATH11
“If you aren't a math person. !”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and limited alignment with homework, making exams a major risk.

Fill-In ExamsNot Multiple Choice24-Hour ExamsSelective CurveDropped Lowest Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence describes 24-hour printed exams, fill-in format, selective curves, and .

24-Hour ExamsFill-In ExamsSelective CurveDropped Lowest ExamRetakes Mentioned
“Gives 24 hours for exams. and they're not online.”
MATH103
“ . All fill in.”
MATH103
“ , and .”
MATH201

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unless you are really good ”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Hard to understand. Goes way too fast. .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

34/100

“If you aren't a math person. !”

🧪

30/100

“ . All fill in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He basically shows the problems, then when he's done answering it he goes on to the next without asking students if they understand or not.
  • He helps as much as you need.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Self-Study

  • on his lectures.
  • You will learn more from mymathlab homework than you will from his lectures.
  • I had to sadly.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • HW .
  • .
  • Be prepare for test as and lecture.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide useful detail across several years, but the online sample is only one review and opinions are somewhat split.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1033 reviews
MATH112 reviews
MATH2012 reviews
MATH2551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values