AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Carlos Perez

ENGR6 · ENGR5 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle inconsistent structure and rely heavily on your own learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingDisorganized SystemsSnarky CommunicationHelpful When EngagedHeavy Homework
  • Reviews are sharply split between inspiring support and very poor organization.
  • Online students report unreliable communication, locked assignments, and .
  • , but and tests causing problems.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades vary, but , and heavy workload make an A feel costly rather than easy.

Online evidence is worse because students report locked assignments, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is not always described as intellectually hard, but weak structure makes it harder to learn.

Online students report needing outside sources, while and poor preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Reviews include participation-focused tags but do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation more often, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Most recent comments warn about poor organization, communication, and reliability despite a few very positive experiences.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and and submission rules can be unforgiving.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest evidence of harsh submission consequences.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention lots of , and outside learning needs.

Format shift

Online , while in-person workload evidence is less direct.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Some students praise his explanations, but many describe him as unprepared, unreliable, or dismissive.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly negative, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and assignments without proving one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes homework and tests, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with some students calling him inspiring and others criticizing attitude and preparation.

Main concern

Student experience appears inconsistent and dependent on professor organization and communication.

What students said

“The way he lectures inspires great confidence in my abilities and drives away my doubts.”
ENGR-5
“Perez was super unprepared this semester.”
ENGR-6

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and weak communication.

Main concern

Online students may need outside videos and self-direction to keep up.

What students said

“A jumbled mess of a class.”
ENGR-5
“prepare to only use videos from outside sources to learn the material”
ENGR-5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Homework And TestsQuizzes MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy structure, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Quizzes MentionedTest Heavy
“many students werent able to turn in quizzes and walked away with a 0.”
ENGR-6

Online

and tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Homework And TestsPolicy Unclear
“even then it barely helps with the homework and tests.”
ENGR-5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A jumbled mess of a class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Perez was super unprepared this semester.”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“You can't turn in the may take forever to do”

👍 Recommendation Risk

38/100

“youre better off taking this class in person at clovis community”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The way he lectures inspires great confidence in my abilities and drives away my doubts.
  • he doesnt teach the class, isnt tech savvy, and isnt reliable AT ALL with communication.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Then, if you miss one assignment, all the locked and you can't complete them.
  • The class isnt super hard but Perez was super unprepared this semester.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • .
  • Perez takes the time to help his students and has the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years provide useful evidence, but the extremely polarized tone lowers confidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGR-57 reviews
ENGR-61 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1