AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Elizabeth Adams

ENG10 · ENGR1A · ENGR2 · ENGR10 · ENG8 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

She can be a strong professor for engaged students, but students needing equal hands-on support should be cautious.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring For SomeKnowledgeableExtra CreditOrganizedFavoritism Concerns
  • Most older reviews , and .
  • Recent negative reviews allege favoritism, impatience, and poor support for struggling students.
  • The course can be an easy A when support and , but experiences vary by student.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Several reviews report A , and lots of , though not everyone feels supported.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students often describe the work as easy and the lectures as clear, though some engineering courses still require engagement.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears repeatedly, but reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and support, but recent complaints make the recommendation conditional.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

, , and many A grades suggest lenient grading despite some tough-grader complaints.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Multiple reviews describe the work as extremely easy or manageable, with available.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Positive , and caring, but negative reviews cite favoritism and weak support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and class work without a single dominant method.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but include serious recent complaints about favoritism and uneven support.

Main concern

Students who are shy, busy, or struggling may feel overlooked.

What students said

“ . Free online textbook, super easy A.”
ENG10
“she tend to not care and brush you off during office hours.”
ENG8

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and retakes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Quiz RetakesPop QuizzesExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, pop quizzes, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

Quiz RetakesPop QuizzesPolicy Unclear
“ and is also easy on the eyes.”
ENG8
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG8

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Free online textbook, super easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and fairness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ . and helpful.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“ . Free online textbook, super easy A.”

⚠️ Support Consistency

68/100

“she tend to not care and brush you off during office hours.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • . and helpful.
  • She is very knowledgeable, clearly wants her students to succeed and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The work is extremely easy and you'll look forward to going to class.
  • . Free online textbook, super easy A.
  • and is also easy on the eyes.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness Concerns

  • she secretly show favoritism in her classes.
  • she treat every students differently.
  • She share student personal information with other students in the class with out the student permission.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews across several years provide detailed but mixed evidence with a .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG83 reviews
ENGR102 reviews
ENGR22 reviews
ENG101 review
ENGR1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2