AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Gretchen Ezaki

MATH105 · RN35 · RN45 · RNPHARMCULT · RN56 · RN33 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a and can tolerate occasional lecture pacing issues.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyOrganized online presenceHelpful and accommodatingClear gradingLight workloadOccasionally aimless lectures
  • Most students describe her as , and clear.
  • Grades appear very achievable with low to moderate difficulty.
  • The main negative theme is that .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

High grades look very achievable because and students describe the workload as manageable.

Online reviews show smooth weekly guidance, while but more mixed lecture experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course content is generally approachable, though some .

Online evidence suggests easier structure, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

63/100

, but reviews do not show a broadly strict attendance policy.

Online reviews focus on asynchronous support, while the morning.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, and responsive despite one harsh complaint about lecture style.

Online recommendations are consistently positive, while but less uniform.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Reported grades are strong and students , and supportive flexibility.

Format shift

Online grading is described as organized and clear, while , and exams.

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload appears light to moderate, with , and exam prep.

Format shift

Online reviews describe short weekly videos, while and a group project.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is usually seen as , and accommodating, but one review strongly criticizes her lecture focus.

Format shift

Online teaching is consistently praised, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment appears to include discussion boards, projects, in-class assignments, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly submissions, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and clarity, with one strong complaint about aimless speaking.

Main concern

Some lectures may feel unfocused or boring.

What students said

“She's super sweet and she's always willing to work with you if you're struggling.”
RN45
“I don't think I've met a professor that speaks more aimlessly than Dr. Ezaki.”
RN56

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students praise her organization, short weekly videos, and fast responses.

Main concern

The online evidence is positive but limited to two reviews.

What students said

“She posts short videos every week about and provides mini lectures about material for that week as well.”
RN35
“ and .”
RN33

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Exams MentionedNo HESI In One CourseFinal Not Too Bad

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence says RN45 had exams, no HESI, and a manageable final, but .

No HESI In One CourseFinal Not Too Bad
“We did not have a hesi for this course and the .”
RN45

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great instructor. I really liked that she has prerecorded lectures online and that it's a hybrid class. She's super sweet and she's always willing to work with you if you're struggling.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is non-intimidating like other teachers and ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“ and .”

📚 Workload

78/100

“ and a group project.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • Shes very good at replying .
  • very accommodating.
  • Knows and teaches several ways for med math

Theme 2

📈 About Structure

  • She posts short videos every week about and provides mini lectures about material for that week as well.
  • She gives in class assignments and usually they are first thing in the morning, so make sure to get there on time!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • I don't think I've met a professor that speaks more aimlessly than Dr. Ezaki.
  • Bring a fidget toy or something, you'll need it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews provide useful but limited evidence, with a long time span and one strong outlier.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

RN332 reviews
RN352 reviews
RN452 reviews
MATH1051 review
RN561 review
Show 1 more courses
RNPHARMCULT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values