AI Rate Professor

Communication

Esaul Barba

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you and videos.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared TeachingRude ToneHeavy ReadingMandatory In PersonLow Tech Confidence
  • The and poor command of the software.
  • and video-based learning despite in-person meetings.
  • The professor is described as blunt and rude, making the class hard to recommend.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

The single B- review and difficulty rating suggest a high effort cost with no evidence of .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course seems difficult mainly because and students must rely on readings, packets, and videos.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

The review though the student felt the class could be online.

Only the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only student gives a very negative account of teaching quality, organization, and attitude.

Recommendation evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

There is no sign of , and the only reported grade is a B- in a difficult class.

Format shift

, so confidence is limited.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review mentions long packets, readings, and videos as major parts of the class.

Format shift

Workload evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The review says the instructor lacks software knowledge, reads from the textbook, and is rude.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review mentions readings, packets, and videos but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says class time mostly repeats textbook, packet, and video material.

Main concern

because the instructor is described as unprepared and rude.

What students said

“he doesn't know what he's doing”
53-27391
“he reads the textbook in class and tells us exactly what it says”
53-27391
“He is blunt and very rude often.”
53-27391

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If what he's doing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“he doesn't know what he's doing”

📚 Workload Style

25/100

“ ”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

8/100

“He is blunt and very rude often.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he doesn't know what he's doing
  • he reads the textbook in class and tells us exactly what it says

Theme 2

📚 About Course Format

  • This class could be completely online, but he insists on in person

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • He is blunt and very rude often.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it is recent and detailed.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

53-273911 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values