AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Priscilla Yglesias

MA2 · MA5 · MA6A · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and direct criticism while staying prepared and self-managed.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedHarsh communicationEasy materialTough graderHands-on lab focus
  • Recent reviews strongly criticize her organization, preparation, communication, and .
  • Positive reviews say the class can be manageable if students pay attention, follow directions, and complete work on time.
  • Grades are often high, but the student experience is inconsistent and frequently stressful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students report A-range grades and say the material or pass/fail structure is not hard, but and .

Online evidence is only one review with an A+ but tough grading complaints, while experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students often say the medical assisting material itself is not difficult, but her organization and expectations make it feel harder.

Both formats suggest the work is manageable, but online and hard content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews emphasize being prepared, paying attention, and following lab directions, but they do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews stress showing up prepared and lab attention, while the single online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews warn against her because of , and inconsistent grading.

The only , and in-person reviews are polarized but recent negative reviews are severe.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

High grades are common, but students repeatedly call her a tough or , and .

Format shift

Online evidence reports tough grading and unclear exam due dates, while and unfair grading complaints.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

as easy or doable, but some students call it hefty, tedious, or unclear.

Format shift

Online workload is described as extremely tedious, while and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive lab-focused reviews exist, but many students describe her as , and difficult to work with.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative but limited, while and strongly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and participation, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and Canvas exams, while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply split, with several recent students describing her as unprepared and harsh while and .

Main concern

Students , and poor preparation.

What students said

“She belittles her students and cuts people off mid sentence.”
MA5
“The material isnt difficult she just makes it harder then it needs to be.”
MA2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only , and tough grading.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and then gets upset when the class did not understand when the .”
MA2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and assessment rules appear inconsistent, with explicit evidence of unclear Canvas exam deadlines but .

Canvas ExamsUnclear Due DatesQuizzesLab Skills Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyLab Skills Grading
“She really wants us to know our skills she can be a but I feel confident about them.”
MA5
“If you do all the homework and .”
MA5

Online

The , but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Canvas ExamsUnclear Due Dates
“ and then gets upset when the class did not understand when the .”
MA2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The material isnt difficult she just makes it harder then it needs to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Experience

42/100

“Very difficult to work with, , and overall a unpleasant professor.”

📈 Easy Content

68/100

“Her class isn't hard at all, but only if you make it hard.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ if needed but the work was hefty but easy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 Teaching and Organization

  • Comes to class not knowing what we are doing.
  • She didn't seem to know what she was doing.
  • She did not follow her syllabus and would change it up.

Theme 2

⚖️ Grading and Assignments

  • deducted.
  • She can be a but I feel confident about them.
  • and and helpful.

Theme 3

❤️ Classroom Treatment

  • She belittles her students and cuts people off mid sentence.
  • She gives constructive criticism but not to be mean.
  • She was a fantastic professor to me.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 14 reviews are fairly recent and detailed, but opinions are highly polarized and online evidence has only one review.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MA57 reviews
MA25 reviews
MA-6A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values