AI Rate Professor

Art

Nanete Maki-Dearsan

ART723468 · ART18 · ART15 · ARTART · ART20 · ART8 · ART00 · DRAWBEG · ART7 · ART5FIGURE · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a demanding traditional art class and can handle strict expectations and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict attendanceTough graderStrong feedbackOld-fashionedPolarizing
  • many students learned a lot, but , and poor approachability.
  • , and accepting her direction matter heavily for success.
  • The class can be expensive and stressful because of , and critique expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A , and fitting her expectations, with several students reporting harsh or biased grading.

and ; the single online review also describes a difficult negative experience.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is intellectually and practically challenging because students , and fast or traditional expectations.

In-person reviews provide detailed evidence of challenge, while the lone online .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance and timeliness are treated as very important, with students warning that lateness and absences affect grades.

In-person reviews repeatedly mention attendance and lateness, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because positive learning outcomes are offset by frequent , and approachability.

In-person opinions are mixed but polarizing, while the only online review is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Grading is strict and sometimes described as biased or , and style conformity.

Format shift

, and the single online review gives no useful grading mechanics.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is heavy for an art class because students mention , and rigorous projects.

Format shift

Online and , but in-person reviews add supplies and long sessions.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

She is knowledgeable and can inspire growth, but her teaching style is polarizing and some students find her harsh or unapproachable.

Format shift

and serious conflict, while the online review is too limited and negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears centered on , and submitted art rather than exams.

Format shift

, while online evidence only mentions homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a polarizing teacher who can inspire and but is strict, subjective, and .

Main concern

Students risk , and personality fit.

What students said

“Late work is rejected NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES!”
ART7
“Great teacher. I learned a lot in her class and had a really great time.”
ART7

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and and seriousness in an art class.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online format evidence is weak but negative.

What students said

“ ”
ART7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a exam format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and critique, not a .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Expect .”
ART7

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are actually creative! I have no idea why there are so many reviews on her saying "Do not take this class if you are actually creative" or " ?!?" Expect .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Nanete is very knowledgeable about drawing, she can get frustrated when students don't listen or follow directions given and scolds them.”

⚖️

22/100

“ so there is no way to know your grade the entire semester.”

⏰

12/100

“Timeliness is very important to her, so be there in time for setup.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really cares that you become an artist and she doesn't want you to leave her class without all the tools to succeed.
  • Great lessons and demos she would give and even during times of doubt during that class she still made me feel like I was good enough for the class.
  • Very rigourous and cynical. Lectures are flat and its easy to zone out of the monotone speaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class was definitely challenging. I passed her class with a C- which I wasn't complaining.
  • If you do the work with effort you will get a good grade.
  • if you don't conform to what she believes is art, you won't be graded fairly.

Theme 3

⏰

  • Late work is rejected NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES!
  • She docs for lates and absences to be plan to be there.
  • Being late it not something she likes! So don't be late to this class!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews across many years provide rich and consistent evidence that the class is polarizing, strict, and feedback-heavy.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART711 reviews
ART202 reviews
ART5FIGURE2 reviews
ART82 reviews
ARTART2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
DRAWBEG2 reviews
ART001 review
ART151 review
ART181 review
ART7234681 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1