AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Shaunt Yemenjian

ARCH34 · ARCH30 · ARC30 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want serious architecture training and can handle blunt critique, heavy work, and high expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate ArchitectStrong FeedbackHeavy ProjectsAttendance MattersBlunt Critiques
  • Most students praise his expertise, passion, and .
  • The course can be demanding, especially with , and .
  • A minority of students report disrespectful behavior, humiliation, unclear communication, or harsh class dynamics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earned A grades, but comments repeatedly say , and handling critique.

Online A outcomes require lecture notes and study, while , and steady effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The material is intellectually and practically demanding because students must learn architecture concepts, design thinking, software, and project execution.

Online reviews emphasize lecture and essay demands, while , and group project workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is strongly expected and .

, while online reviews instead stress watching lectures and staying engaged.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and feedback, but strong negative reports about disrespect and harsh delivery create real hesitation.

Online reviews are uniformly positive, while and serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are often high, but students , and critique-driven evaluation.

Format shift

Online grading appears rubric-based and study-driven, while , and design critique.

Workload

Heavy

31/100

The workload is heavy because reviews cite demanding projects, software learning, group work, lots of homework, and high expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lecture notes and essay exams, while , and group bottlenecks.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is widely seen as knowledgeable, passionate, and helpful, but his blunt or disrespectful delivery hurts the experience for some students.

Format shift

Online students praise lectures and passion, while and severe criticism about classroom behavior.

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

Assessment appears mixed across projects, participation, group work, software deliverables, writing, and essay-style exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention essay exams and lectures, while , and software work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive about feedback and expertise, but several students , and harsh public criticism.

Main concern

The main risk is blunt or disrespectful critique combined with demanding projects and .

What students said

“Will cook you a bit in front of class, not for his enjoyment, but for your benefit.”
ARCH34
“if you dont go to class , you definitely wont pass.”
ARCH30
“He humiliates students in front of everyone.”
ARCH34

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are highly positive but , and a need to study and stay self-motivated.

Main concern

Online success depends on watching lectures, taking notes, and .

What students said

“you must watch and ”
ARCH30
“As long as you pay attention to his lectures and study you will pass.”
ARC30
“ ”
ARCH34

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but online reviews mention essay-format exams that require substantial writing and lecture notes.

Essay-Style ExamsLecture-Based StudyProject-Heavy Assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews support essay-format exams based on video lectures, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Essay-Style ExamsVideo Lecture Notes Required
“your writing should be substantial due to the ”
ARCH30
“pay attention to his lectures and study”
ARC30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely a difficult course but you also learn a lot from it”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in expertise, critique, workload, and recommendation risk; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ , and strongly believes in putting in the work to have a presentable project.”

📈 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ .”

⚠️ Workload And Critique

31/100

“The , and demanding, but if you can keep up with the workload you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Shaunt is clearly passionate with his teachings.
  • His expertise and world-class perspective on global architects/design philosophies were invaluable.
  • , and strongly believes in putting in the work to have a presentable project.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • People who tend to slack off are in for a hard term if they think his classes are easy.
  • The , and demanding, but if you can keep up with the workload you'll be fine.
  • As long as you pay attention to his lectures and study you will pass.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • He might be blunt or tough with his words, but he says it for .
  • He humiliates students in front of everyone.
  • shows up late, poor communication, dishonest, uses profanity in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 detailed reviews span recent and older terms, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARCH3411 reviews
ARCH305 reviews
ARC302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values