AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Logan Tennerelli

CRIM13 · COUNSELLING54 · COUN54 · AMST11 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Tennerelli if you want an a high grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and funnyHighly recommendedParticipation mattersLaw made engagingLenient grading
  • Students consistently describe Tennerelli as caring, funny, knowledgeable, and motivating.
  • Grades appear very reachable when students attend, participate, and make an effort.
  • The course can include , and a final, but the workload is usually manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

A high grade is very realistic if students attend, participate, and complete the main assignments, with comments pointing to easy work, , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The legal concepts can require attention to cases and amendments, but students say she makes the material relatable, interesting, and easy to engage with.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Participation matters in many reviews, but one student also noted a and there is no sign of .

Only in-person reviews exist, and but not described as severely strict.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and helps students succeed.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students report , and that showing up and making an effort can lead to a high grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Most comments describe rare or easy work, though some CRIM13 students mention essays, presentations, case briefs, quizzes, and a final.

Format shift

The workload picture .

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students repeatedly praise her as caring, funny, knowledgeable, approachable, and able to make law engaging.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention participation, essays, presentations, quizzes, case briefs, and a .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely positive, emphasizing caring teaching, humor, participation, and reachable grades.

Main concern

Some students should expect participation and occasional major assignments like essays, presentations, or a final.

What students said

“ .”
AMST11
“Shes fantastic! The work is very easy and shes very good at getting everyone involved and keeping the subjects of whats she teaches interesting.”
COUN54
“Professor Tennerelli is very caring and has a passion for teaching and helping us understand how Constitutional Rights work.”
CRIM13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Final MentionedOnline Quizzes MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final, but do not clearly prove detailed exam rules or proctoring policies.

Online Quizzes MentionedFinal Mentioned
“The toughest assignments were the , and the final.”
CRIM13
“The and based on the lectures and the case briefs got easier as you practiced.”
CRIM13

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“Professor Tennerelli is very caring and has a passion for teaching and helping us understand how Constitutional Rights work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Value

88/100

“as long as you show up to class and make an effort you should get a high grade!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher, the way she taught law principles helped the class relate them to their own experiences and ideas.
  • Great personality. Laidback and approachable but also shows you what law school is really like.
  • Shes fantastic! The work is very easy and shes very good at getting everyone involved and keeping the subjects of whats she teaches interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • as long as you show up to class and make an effort you should get a high grade!
  • The toughest assignments were the , and the final.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Great sense of humor and really cares about students
  • Really caring and funny and knows a ton about law school, Logan got me wanting to be a lawyer more.
  • The .!! Totally a life changing class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed reviews over several years are highly consistent and strongly positive, though all evidence is in person.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AMST114 reviews
CRIM134 reviews
COUN542 reviews
COUNSELLING541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2