AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Kristen Stenger

FN29834 · NUTR42 · FN4033967 · FN35 · FN45 · FN40 · FN45096 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
79.55%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you will keep up with and use the study guides, especially for in-person sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaring and approachableStudy guides for examsLots of online homeworkPop quizzes in person
  • Most students describe Stenger as , and highly recommendable.
  • and more guided than online sections.
  • Online students often report heavy weekly work even when grades are still reachable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very attainable with steady work, study guides, and attendance, but online sections can require substantial weekly effort.

, while in-person evidence more often calls the A straightforward if students attend and study.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The nutrition content is usually described as clear and manageable, though online modules and .

In-person students find the course easier because lectures and study guides clarify exams, while and assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not always formally mandatory, but class participation, pop quizzes, and .

Online attendance is mostly self-paced through modules, while because quizzes and exam guidance happen in class.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students strongly recommend her for , and predictable exams, with the main hesitation being online workload.

Both formats are recommended, but reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grading is generally fair to lenient with study guides, makeups, and , though some online students .

Format shift

because small assignments and , while in-person grading is usually described as clear and forgiving.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is manageable in person but often heavy , and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention lots of homework, while assignments plus exams or quizzes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students consistently praise her clear explanations, caring attitude, engaging lectures, and ability to simplify nutrition concepts.

Format shift

Teaching is praised in both formats, with and engagement.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of , and participation.

Format shift

Online sections lean more toward weekly assignments and exams, while , and a project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very positive, with , and attendance-linked participation or quizzes.

Main concern

Skipping class can hurt because , and .

What students said

“Study the study guide and youll pass easy.”
FN4033967
“ , and you'll pass for sure.”
FN40
“The study guides she gives are exactly the same as the exam.”
FN35

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise clear lectures but repeatedly , and slower grading.

Main concern

The online workload can feel much heavier than the difficulty level suggests.

What students said

“Easy A, just do the work.”
FN40
“ if you have time to devote to her class.”
FN40
“No zoom lectures, watch uploaded lectures on your own time.”
FN4033967

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Study GuidesTimed ExamsWritten ResponsesPop QuizzesIn-Person Final Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and multiple exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Study GuidesPop QuizzesMultiple Exams
“She goes through everything thats on the test and gives you a study guide that has all the questions for all tests.”
FN4033967
“There were a total of 7 different tests and about 10 pop quizzes.”
NUTR42

Online

, and study guides, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Timed ExamsWritten ResponsesStudy Guides
“Exams are questions with 5 written responses.”
FN40
“Due to the response questions earlier along with a study guide.”
FN40

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and you'll pass for sure.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Professor Stenger does a great job breaking down the content in her class.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“ if you have time to devote to her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are very interesting and make the concepts easy to comprehend.
  • She breaks it down perfectly and simplifies it beautifully.
  • Stenger is a great professor. She really knows her stuff and breaks information down.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A, just do the work.
  • Just put a little effort in and go to class and it's a pretty easy A
  • Not one of the easiest classes I've taken, but I passed with not too much effort.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload And Exams

  • There was a lot of homework, but easy to do because it's answering questions & watching short videos.
  • Professor Stenger gives a lot of work!
  • She gives a study guide for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 49 reviews across many years with consistent themes about teaching quality, workload, grades, and format differences.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

FN403396725 reviews
FN4018 reviews
FN352 reviews
FN298341 review
FN451 review
Show 2 more courses
FN450961 review
NUTR421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 5 · A 20 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 6

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values