AI Rate Professor

Decision Science

Dee Cetin-Berber

DS21 · DS25 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if possible, but be cautious about online sections because the only online review reports almost no teaching interaction.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStrong In PersonBeginner FriendlyClear LecturesOpen Note ExamsWeak Online Course
  • In-person students strongly praise her as , and confidence-building.
  • The single online review is sharply negative and says the professor did not teach or interact.
  • Grades are strong, and in-person work and exams are described as manageable when students pay attention.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

In-person students report simple work, many chances to get answers right, and easy open-note exams, though online learning may require self-teaching.

The Easy A evidence comes mostly from in-person DS21 reviews, while the lone online DS25 review reports poor instructional support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

In-person students say she makes decision science and math feel learnable, but online programming content assumed prior knowledge.

In-person sections look beginner-friendly, while the online section appears much harder because it relied on a book.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance policy is not clearly stated, but helps homework and exams.

Only in-person reviews discuss lecture value, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

, but the single online review creates a meaningful format warning.

Recommendation is high for in-person sections and low for the only online section.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades are high, homework gives many chances, and as easy open-note assessments.

Format shift

In-person grading appears lenient, while the .

Workload

Light

80/100

In-person students describe the work as simple and easy when they follow lecture.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds light, while the online and quiz preparation.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

In-person teaching is excellent, but the online review reports almost no teaching presence.

Format shift

Teaching quality is excellent in person and poor online, so the overall score is blended downward.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and open-note exams, with no sign that one method fully dominates.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions book quizzes, while and open-note exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe her as , and supportive, especially for students returning to math.

Main concern

One student still rated difficulty high despite praising her teaching.

What students said

“SHE made the class easy.”
DS21
“The as long as you paid attention and it's open note!”
DS21
“Her lectures are straightforward, and she if .”
DS21

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is very negative and describes a .

Main concern

The student says the professor did not teach or interact with the class.

What students said

“I expected the professor to teach. She did not.”
DS25
“I learned NOTHING from her.”
DS25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and easy exams, while online exam policy is not clearly proven beyond book quizzes.

Open Note ExamsEasy ExamsBook Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

to lecture attention.

Open Note ExamsEasy Exams
“The as long as you paid attention and it's open note!”
DS21

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes from a book, but do not clearly prove webcam, .

Book Quizzes
“assigned a book that we were to read and ”
DS25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Berber is AMAZING!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting the and online criticism; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Her lectures are straightforward, and she if .”

📈 Grade Friendliness

82/100

“The as long as you pay attention to the lecture and you get many chances to get the right answer.”

⚠️ Online Warning

25/100

“I expected the professor to teach. She did not.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Berber is AMAZING!
  • Her lectures are straightforward, and she if .
  • She is one of the kindest professors I have ever met.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • SHE made the class easy.
  • The as long as you pay attention to the lecture and you get many chances to get the right answer.
  • The as long as you paid attention and it's open note!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • This professor did not interact with the class.
  • It assumed prior knowledge.
  • I learned NOTHING from her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited because only 4 reviews are available, and the .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DS213 reviews
DS251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values