AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Antonia Yeung

ESM144 · PSY42 · MATH103 · MATH10B · MATH42 · MATH11 · MATH10A · MATH75 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can attend consistently, practice math independently, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict gradingMandatory attendanceHeavy homeworkGroup workPolarizing teaching
  • Reviews are sharply split, but , and harsh attendance rules.
  • Students , and practice independently sometimes report clear structure and strong results.
  • Online reviews are more positive overall than older in-person reviews, but and due-date risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn A grades by showing up and practicing, but , and unforgiving tests.

Online reviews make passing sound more manageable, while attendance and steady work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Math content is often described as tough, fast, or unless students practice heavily on their own.

Online comments are more forgiving, while and confusing instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

, and group work are mandatory, with severe penalties for absences.

Both formats value participation, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation depends heavily on student discipline because some praise her structure while many and workload.

Online recommendations are more positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students repeatedly cite tough grading, no rounding, harsh point deductions, and .

Format shift

Online grading has mixed reports, while as strict or harsh.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and outside practice are recurring workload complaints.

Format shift

Online workload is described as manageable by some, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

47/100

Some students find her clear and caring, but many describe , weak explanations, and limited help.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is more positive, while and often negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to combine , and exams, with tests often carrying high pressure.

Format shift

and finals, while in-person reviews emphasize tests, group activities, participation, and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with repeated , and confusing lectures.

Main concern

Students may struggle if they miss class, dislike group work, or .

What students said

“If you miss more than 4 classes you will automatically be dropped.”
MATH42
“ .”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive but , and staying on schedule.

Main concern

A .

What students said

“Go to class and do your hw and you'll pass.”
MATH10A
“she changed the due date of the so i couldnt submit it and i failed the class”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because and difficult exams, but proctoring and open-book policies are not clearly proven.

Test HeavyHigh-Stakes TestsStudy Guide Similarity VariesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and difficult exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policy.

Test HeavyHigh-Stakes TestsGroup Tests In Some Courses
“ .”
MATH11
“ .”
MATH10A

Online

Online reviews mention homework, class participation, and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Final Due-Date RiskReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“she changed the due date of the so i couldnt submit it and i failed the class”
MATH11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All the resources to succeed are there, but rely on your effort and willingness to practice on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized teaching quality; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

47/100

“The material can be very tough, but she tries to break problems down to make them easier to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

43/100

“ and !!”

⚖️

24/100

“She docked me 5 points because i didn't put degree fahrenheit.”

Theme 1

📌

  • If you miss more than 4 classes you will automatically be dropped.
  • DONT MISS ANY DAY AT ALL!
  • Go to class, you do group work for your participation grade.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She teaches fast & doesn't round up grades.
  • .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are broken down and explained through which is good.
  • Lectures are BLOCKS of text & equations straight from the textbook publisher.
  • and funny. and teaches in an incredible way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews across multiple years give rich, repeated evidence of , and grading concerns.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH1112 reviews
MATH10A5 reviews
ESM1443 reviews
MATH-752 reviews
MATH10B2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH422 reviews
MATH1031 review
PSY421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 4

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2